August 3rd, 2012Top StoryTotal Recall is not a fantasy you want implanted in your brainBy Annalee Newitz Total Recall is like Bourne Identity met Blade Runner, then had an ugly tabloid breakup followed by a nervous breakdown and a tell-all book. This remake of the 1990 cult classic Total Recall has all the ingredients of greatness, but squanders them. The result is an opulent film, packed with shiny details, that never persuades us to engage with its storyline — or even to have a good time. In one way, Total Recall does succeed. It is a comprehensive re-imagining of Paul Verhoven's film, itself based extremely loosely on a Philip K. Dick short story. Verhoeven's Recall took its main character to Mars, where he heroically helped the oppressed plebes and mutants of the Red Planet get out from under the thumb of the corporation that owns the oxygen in their habitrails. The first film had a kind of Golden Age SF expansiveness that made it both silly and profoundly fun. The new Total Recall is a much darker film, set on a post-apocalyptic Earth where chemical warfare has forced all of humanity live in two megacities — the UK and Australia (called simply The Colony). There are no mutants, no space travel, and no epic adventures. It's gritty urban realism of the future, complete with surveillance and environmental catastrophe. Our hero (Colin Farrell) is an average Joe with an annoying wife named Lori (Kate Beckinsale) and a crappy job on an assembly line building robocops (nice detail). But he yearns for a better life. So he goes to Rekall, a company that promises to implant him with fun memories of being a super spy. But it turns out that he's already got some false memories — and the real "him" is a guy named Hauser who is leading the Colony's resistance against the UK. Cue three giant chase scenes: one to get to a Bourne Identity-style safe deposit box; one through urban slums like the ones in Blade Runner; and one of which has him zooming in wall-climbing cars ala Minority Report. Instead of Mars, this new Total Recall gives us a literal hole in the ground. The big showstopper of the movie, which its creators have touted extensively, is "The Fall," a giant elevator that plunges through the center of the Earth. It's the super-fast form of transportation between the UK and The Colony, delivering the oppressed in The Colony to their low-income jobs in the UK. It's a cool idea, but in a movie whose premise is "we went gritty and real this time" it was probably not the right way to go. Let's leave aside the irritatingly improbable physics of the thing (you'll see what I mean — wear something soft on your forehead because you're going to slap it). The main problem with The Fall is that this movie is supposed to be all about how Earth is in this desperate state of collapse. Where, exactly, did they get the money and the resources for this incredible feat of civil engineering? Boring a hole through the planet, and running a functional elevator through it, is arguably as difficult as getting our collective asses to Mars. Or using geoengineering to repair all the chemical warfare damage. But I don't mean to get nerdy about the facts, here. The worst thing about The Fall is that it is visually boring. When it's in action, we see the elevator as a blip on the bad guy's surveillance screens, a tiny Pong-like dash falling through a glowing blue circle. And when our heroes are on board, it's just a room with some seats inside a big industrial building. I think the problem with The Fall is a miniature version of the problem with this whole film. There's a mismatch between the nuts and bolts of the world and the story that's supposed to be unfolding there. Hauser's identity has been shattered by futuristic technology, and he suddenly discovers he's supposed to be on a mission to liberate half the world's population. But instead of sorting shit out and kicking ass, he wastes a lot of time fighting with his "wife," who turns out to be a spy from the bad guys. Even though this should be spy vs. spy stuff, Hauser spends most of the movie making bitter husband comments about Lori — and his "real" girlfriend, rebel Melina (Jessica Biel), has to have this weird jealousy/fight tension with Lori. Is this a "saving the world" movie, or an "I hate my ex-wife" movie? Because I didn't sign up to watch the latter, and that's what I got. The movie's meandering plot structure also includes an abortive storyline about the robocops taking human jobs, as well as a lot of confusing and contradictory information about the Colony rebellion and terrorism. This choppiness isn't helped by the acting, which ranges from atrocious to phoned-in. Beckinsale, who has proven herself a seriously badass action actor in the Underworld movies, spends most of the movie snarking unenthusiastically, and Farrell does his best Zoolander face throughout. Even Bryan Cranston, playing the bad guy, is uninspiring. It's a terrible shame, because this cast could have been fantastic. And the movie's concept design is breathtaking. Like I said initially — all the ingredients for a terrific movie are here. But they never come together. Plus, Total Recall is set in a dystopian future so grim that you never wonder, "Is it real or is it Rekall?" as the ads suggest. It may be unrealistic, but it's certainly not somebody's heroic fantasy, because everything sucks. |
|
A destination on the Interweb to brighten your day (now get back to work!)
Friday, August 3, 2012
Total Recall is not a fantasy you want implanted in your brain
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment