| |
Dear Prudence Who's Your Mommy? Dear Prudence advises a man whose wife doesn't want their twins to know they came from donor eggs—during a live chat at Washingtonpost.com. Posted Monday, Oct 17, 2011, at 07:49 PM ET Emily Yoffe, aka Dear Prudence, is on Washingtonpost.com weekly to chat live with readers. An edited transcript of this week's chat is below. (Sign up here to get Dear Prudence delivered to your inbox each week. Read Prudie's Slate columns here. Send questions to Prudence at prudence@slate.com.) Emily Yoffe: Good afternoon. I look forward to your questions. Q. The need to know: We've been happily married for over 20 years, and we are blessed with two wonderful children (twins). But, there's a deep family secret: Everybody knows we used in vitro fertilization, but only my wife and I know the children came from donor eggs. The donor was of my wife's general ethnicity, skin and hair color, etc., so the children's looks are a near-perfect blend of hers and mine, and nobody suspects. The issue is whether or not the children ever know their origin, and if so, when? My point of view is that there are important medical issues potentially at stake, and they should eventually be told. Anyway, they will find out immediately if either one ever has a DNA scan—the results will come back with the "wrong" country of origin, and better they hear the news from us instead of from some lab. My wife's point of view is that telling the children that fact would be like taking her children away from her. I agree that it's much more important to her than to ... To continue reading, click here. Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum What did you think of this article? POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES Also In Slate Lithwick: How To Avoid Getting Arrested at Your Local Occupy Wall Street Protest Why Roz Chast Hates Superheroes. And Elevators. And Carnivals. And ... Who Cares if Running Backs Don't Do Much Running? | Advertisement |
Manage your newsletters subscription: Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Advertising Information | |
Ideas on how to make something better? Send an e-mail to slatenewsletter@nl.slate.com. Copyright 2011 The Slate Group | Privacy Policy |
A destination on the Interweb to brighten your day (now get back to work!)
Monday, October 17, 2011
Dear Prudence: Who's Your Mommy?
Moneybox: Is the Occupy Movement Anti-Democratic?
| |
Moneybox Is the Occupy Movement Anti-Democratic? The global protests may actually undermine democracy rather than strengthen it. By Anne Applebaum Posted Monday, Oct 17, 2011, at 05:48 PM ET On paper, it isn't easy to reproduce the oddity of the Occupy the London Stock Exchange rally that took place on the steps of St. Paul's Cathedral last weekend. It's all very British—people are cooking pots of porridge on the sidewalk—yet reverent homage is being paid to the original Occupy Wall Street protests, too. The London demonstrators have even adopted the "human mic" used in New York's Zucotti Park—the crowd in front repeats whatever the speaker says, so that the crowd in back can hear—despite the fact that megaphones and microphones have not been banned in London. The effect, as can be heard on the Guardian's online video, was something like this: "We need to have a process" (We need to have a process!) "This meeting was called for a reason!" (This meeting was called for a reason!) "We know that you are there!" (We know that you are there!) "And we have solidarity with you" (We have solidarity with you!) Unintentionally, it sounds a lot like a scene from the Monty Python movie Life of Brian, the one in which Brian, who has been mistaken for the messiah, shouts out at the crowd, "You are all individuals!" The crowd shouts back: "We are all individuals!" To my American ear, the resemblance is reinforced by the fact that the speakers are British, and thus sound as if they belong in a Monty Python movie anyway. But this isn't unusual: Inevitably ... To continue reading, click here. Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum What did you think of this article? POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES Also In Slate Lithwick: How To Avoid Getting Arrested at Your Local Occupy Wall Street Protest Why Roz Chast Hates Superheroes. And Elevators. And Carnivals. And ... Who Cares if Running Backs Don't Do Much Running? | Advertisement |
Manage your newsletters subscription: Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Advertising Information | |
Ideas on how to make something better? Send an e-mail to slatenewsletter@nl.slate.com. Copyright 2011 The Slate Group | Privacy Policy |
How to Fix Internet Embarrassments and Improve Your Online Reputation
By Adam Dachis How to Fix Internet Embarrassments and Improve Your Online Reputation
Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt famously said, "If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place." His advice probably is your best course of action if you never want to be embarrassed again in your life, but it's also a good way to never have fun again. In fact, for most of us, there are certain embarrassments we're happy to share with certain folks but not others. At some point we've all had something to hide, but the internet makes that difficult. In this post we're going to take a look at how you can retake your privacy (or at least greatly improve it) and control your online reputation. First we'll take a look at Facebook, the most popular social network on the planet and subsquently home to some of your most embarrassing photos, public arguments, and so on. Then we'll look at controlling what shows up on the web in general. Get Embarrassing Content Removed from FacebookFacebook wants to be the place where you share everything, but there are some moments in life you'd probably rather keep private. You can certainly prevent yourself from posting embarrassing drunk photos or a love letter you sent to a crush in high school, but you can't control other people. When a friend, family member, or enemy posts content you don't want anyone to see, here are the steps you need to take to get it removed. Stage One: Use Facebook's Built-in Content Removal Tools
In the event that the problem photo is not terribly extreme, however, and you just don't want it showing up as one of the top five photos on your profile, you can remove it very easily. Just hover over that photo's thumbnail on your page and click the little "X" that appears in the top right corner. These are the most common types of embarrassing content you'd want to remove and report, but Facebook provides similar tools for just about anything on the site. For instructions on dealing with embarrassing groups, fake profiles, and more, check out Facebook's content reporting FAQ. Stage Two: Ask Your Friend to Remove the Embarrassing Content
Stage Three: Contact Facebook
For more ways to contact Facebook regarding specific issues, check out this note. Stage Four: Beef Up Your Privacy Settings
To do this, you need to start by accessing your Privacy Settings. These are easy to find by going to the top right part of any page and clicking on the downward facing triangle (pictured to the right). This will reveal a menu where you can click Privacy Settings. From there you have a few relevant options.
The How Tags Work section provides you with several options to help prevent unwanted tagging of photos, messages, and more. You can turn on "Profile Review" and "Tag Review" so that you get to approve every tag before it's allowed to become active. Finally, the Manage Blocking section will allow you to block users from interacting with you in any way. You'll find this option at the bottom of the page and will only want to use it in extreme circumstances. It's important to remember that while it will prevent them from tagging you in embarrassing content, it won't prevent them from posting it. For more Facebook privacy tips, be sure to check out our always up-to-date guide on managing your Facebook privacy. Remove or Bury Unwanted Search ResultsThe fastest way to drudge up embarrassing information about anyone—whether they're on Facebook or not—is by hitting up your search engine of choice (although there are plenty of other methods). When your own shameful content shows up in Google, you can't always get it removed but there is plenty you can do to bury it. Step One: Attempt to Get the Content Officially Removed
In extreme situations, you can submit a legal complaint to Google. Google tends to respond to these legal complaints with quick removal, not taking much effort to investigate. This can be good for you if you want something removed, but bad for the person whose page is being removed as the appeal process can take a long time. You don't want to go this route unless someone is using your likeness without your consent, using your work without permission, defaming you, or potentially breaking the law in another way. Step Two: Bury the Unwanted Content So Nobody Can Find It
As we've previously discussed, registering your name as a domain name and putting up a name plate web site can help you reclaim what shows up in your search results. Just be sure to add links to your web site on other social sites to help increase its page rank. You'll need to actually manage your online reputation once you have it set up so your content rises above the embarrassing stuff you can't destroy. This doesn't require much more than actually using the services you sign up for and posting only things you want others to see. If you have a problem posting responsibly, install Internet Shame Insurance to get a warning before you post content you'll regret. How About You?Personally, I like to keep my embarrassments alive and well on the internet but I have quite a few friends who have struggled with the problem of eliminating theirs. It can be a long process to cover up the stuff you don't want others to see even if you do know what you're doing. Have you gone through the trouble of keeping your online persona pristine and shame-free? If you have any additional tips or stories to share, you know where to post them! (If you don't, actually, that place would be the comments.) You can follow Adam Dachis, the author of this post, on Twitter, Google+, and Facebook. Twitter's the best way to contact him, too. | October 17th, 2011 Top Stories |
Apple's REAL Earnings Expectations
If you believe this has been sent to you in error, please safely unsubscribe.