|
A destination on the Interweb to brighten your day (now get back to work!)
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Top Stories from the last 24 hours
THR The Race Alert: Watch Live Q&A With 'Iron Lady's' Meryl Streep Moderated by Scott Feinberg
|
You are currently subscribed to The Hollywood Reporter Breaking News newsletter as dwyld.kwu.11muchado2011@blogger.com
Newsletter Preferences | Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Share on Twitter or Facebook
© 2011 The Hollywood Reporter 5700 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90036.
All rights reserved. Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy.
To ensure delivery of our emails, please add email@mail.hollywoodreporter.com to your address book.
Film Review: New Year's Eve
|
You are currently subscribed to The Hollywood Reporter Breaking News newsletter as dwyld.kwu.11muchado2011@blogger.com
Newsletter Preferences | Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Share on Twitter or Facebook
© 2011 The Hollywood Reporter 5700 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90036.
All rights reserved. Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy.
To ensure delivery of our emails, please add email@mail.hollywoodreporter.com to your address book.
Politics: More Like Reagan?
Now playing: Slate V, a video-only site from the world's leading online magazine. Visit Slate V at www.slatev.com. | |
Politics More Like Reagan? Why Gingrich is surging past Romney in Iowa. By John Dickerson Posted Tuesday, Dec 06, 2011, at 03:30 AM ET DES MOINES—Conservatives prize constancy above all else, but if Republicans are really faced with a choice between Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney, this will be a nomination defined by reversals. Nominating Gingrich will require conservatives to embrace a sweeping ideological reversal. Nominating Romney will require Republicans to embrace a candidate who is defined by personal reversals. If Mitt Romney is the nominee, conservatives will have to reverse themselves on the idea of constancy itself. His flips are numerous and on videotape. Gingrich would need persuade two of the most powerful forces in modern Republican politics to reverse themselves. Social conservatives and Tea Party activists would appear to have insurmountable objections to Gingrich. Social conservative leaders have long argued that presidents must have a sterling private history. Gingrich has the most checkered personal past in the Republican field, with two divorces and an admitted adulterous affair. Tea Party activists, meanwhile, largely blame establishment politicians in both parties for government bloat and a system that rewards the well-connected and influential. Gingrich was in Congress for 20 years and afterward joined the non-elected establishment, making millions working for Freddie Mac and other private companies seeking influence and advice in Washington. Gingrich appears to be well on his way to winning over social conservatives and Tea Party supporters in Iowa. Gingrich is the front-runner and leads Romney by between 8 and 9 points in the most recent Des Moines Register poll and the NBC/Marist poll. To continue reading, click here. Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum What did you think of this article? POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES Also In Slate Iowa Conservatives Ought To Loathe Gingrich. Why Are They Flocking to Him? How Winner-Takes-All Markets Are Making the Rich Even Richer Why Publishing Movie Reviews Early Is Bad for Everyone | Advertisement |
Manage your newsletters subscription: Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Advertising Information | |
Ideas on how to make something better? Send an e-mail to slatenewsletter@nl.slate.com. Copyright 2011 The Slate Group | Privacy Policy |
Moneybox: Why Has Inequality Been Growing?
Now playing: Slate V, a video-only site from the world's leading online magazine. Visit Slate V at www.slatev.com. | |
Moneybox Why Has Inequality Been Growing? How technology and winner-take-all markets have made the rich so much richer. By Robert H. Frank Posted Tuesday, Dec 06, 2011, at 12:16 PM ET The first part of this series described how growing income disparities have made it more expensive for middle-income families to achieve many basic goals, such as sending their children to a decent school. Today's installment discusses the forces that have caused income disparities to grow in recent decades. This essay is adapted from Robert H. Frank's recently published book, The Darwin Economy. Effective remedies for growing income disparities require a clear understanding of the forces that have caused them. In their recent book, Winner-Take-All Politics, Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson have argued that explosive salary growth at the top has been fueled by a more lax regulatory environment purchased with campaign contributions. That's a spot-on description of what happened in the financial services industry, which is of course the principal target of the OWS movement. But it's an unsatisfactory account of why inequality has been rising in other occupations. The same pattern of income growth we've seen for the population as a whole has been replicated for virtually every subgroup that's been studied. It holds for dentists, real-estate agents, authors, attorneys, newspaper columnists, musicians, and plastic surgeons. It holds for electrical engineers and English majors. And in none of those instances has it been primarily the result of regulatory favors. To continue reading, click here. Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum What did you think of this article? POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES Also In Slate Iowa Conservatives Ought To Loathe Gingrich. Why Are They Flocking to Him? How Winner-Takes-All Markets Are Making the Rich Even Richer Why Publishing Movie Reviews Early Is Bad for Everyone | Advertisement |
Manage your newsletters subscription: Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Advertising Information | |
Ideas on how to make something better? Send an e-mail to slatenewsletter@nl.slate.com. Copyright 2011 The Slate Group | Privacy Policy |
Quote on Anti-Semitism Misattributed to U.S. Ambassador Doesn't Ease Criticism
|
Arts: Kyra Sedgwick Interrogates the Procedural
Now playing: Slate V, a video-only site from the world's leading online magazine. Visit Slate V at www.slatev.com. | |
Culturebox Kyra Sedgwick Interrogates the Procedural TNT's underappreciated The Closer is challenging a tired genre. By June Thomas Posted Tuesday, Dec 06, 2011, at 10:37 PM ET People have been underestimating Deputy Chief Brenda Leigh Johnson of the LAPD for seven seasons now. Villains are thrown off-guard when the ditsy blonde saunters into the interview room and completely disarmed when she unleashes her Southern drawl. But lurking behind that charming exterior is a cunning officer who extracts confessions from murder suspects as easily as she separates Ding Dongs from their wrappers. Critics and casual viewers have also sorely misjudged The Closer, which airs on TNT Mondays at 9 p.m. ET. If you've thought about the series at all in the past few years, you've likely considered it to be just another procedural—comfort TV for fans of CSI and Law & Order. But don't let the squad-room setting and the show's popularity fool you. The Closer is complex, riveting, and beautifully acted, and it belongs in the TV pantheon alongside The Sopranos, The Wire, and Breaking Bad. The show aired its 100th episode Monday night, and as it nears the halfway point in its final season, The Closer is challenging the TV convention of the heroic crime-solver who takes justice into her own hands—and, in the process, challenging the entire genre of procedural television. Good procedurals are like Old Faithful: Reliability is their defining characteristic. The Closer offers up a quality mystery and a tricky interrogation each week, but unlike, say, CSI, it does so without becoming predictable. Instead, it keeps viewers guessing by varying its dramatic tone. Sometimes the show ... To continue reading, click here. Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum What did you think of this article? POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES Also In Slate Iowa Conservatives Ought To Loathe Gingrich. Why Are They Flocking to Him? How Winner-Takes-All Markets Are Making the Rich Even Richer Why Publishing Movie Reviews Early Is Bad for Everyone | Advertisement |
Manage your newsletters subscription: Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Advertising Information | |
Ideas on how to make something better? Send an e-mail to slatenewsletter@nl.slate.com. Copyright 2011 The Slate Group | Privacy Policy |
Reuters Health Report
If you are having trouble viewing this email or would like to view it in your web browser, CLICK HERE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/6/2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|