|
A destination on the Interweb to brighten your day (now get back to work!)
Monday, June 4, 2012
How to Turn Your Android into a Killer Portable Media and Gaming Center
June 4th, 2012Top StoryHow to Turn Your Android into a Killer Portable Media and Gaming Center
In this post we're going to take your Android device and turn it into a portable media center that can do all the cool things in the video above. We're going to put together a system that can play and stream your music and videos, function as a retro arcade, and take input from a game controller. When you're done you'll be able to hook your Android device up to any television set with an HDMI input, so it's like you're bringing your home media center everywhere you go. Every time I'm with friends and we want to watch a movie or show we don't have or just don't have something to do, I've got the solution in my backpack. After a minute, we're up and running. It's incredibly easy. What You'll Need
So how much will this all cost? There's a decent chance you'll only need to buy an HDMI adapter, which costs $20-30, and Plex, which costs $5. If you don't already have a game controller, you can usually pick one up for $30-50 (or less if you buy used). Either way, the set up is pretty cheap and worth the total cost. Step One: Test Out Your HDMI Adapter
In some cases you might need to do a tiny bit more work to get things up and running. In the case of my tablet—a Samsung Galaxy tab—I also need to connect it to power. It provides an additional port to connect a USB power cable. As soon as I do this, the tablet starts sending its video to the television. Other devices may have slight variances, so check with your adapter's manual if you're having any trouble. Step Two: Set Up Plex to Stream Your Media
The nice thing about Plex is that to get it set up you just need to create an account and sign in on all your devices (including your desktop computer). This makes it very simple to connect remotely without any advanced configuration. That said, if you want to do it the old fashioned way (i.e. port forwarding) or just want some very detailed instructions, we have a guide to help you out. However you go about, when you're done you'll be able to stream media from your home to your device.
Step Three: Set Up Your Retro Arcade
Mobile emulation can get pretty specific, so if you want detailed instructions be sure to read our complete guide. That said, installing a couple of emulators is pretty simple. Here's a list of our favorites for Android: Once you've got the emulator you can find games on sites like EmuParadise and CoolROM. Just toss your games on your Android device (or on its SD card) and you'll be able to play them in the emulator. Step Four: Pair a Controller
Although I prefer the A Sony Sixaxis Wireless Controller because it has more buttons and is more comfortable to hold, a Nintendo Wiimote will also work. You can connect up to four of either type of controller (and, presumably, a combination of both), but you really only need one to get the job done. If you're visiting a friend and they have a few extra controllers lying around, you can temporarily pair theirs as well.
Step Five: More Media
Photo by XYZ (Shutterstock). |
|
This Is How You Make Something Go Viral: An Impractical Guide
June 4th, 2012Top StoryThis Is How You Make Something Go Viral: An Impractical Guide
Internet publishers — successful ones — have concocted numerous sub rosa playbooks around traffic-goosing techniques: from the early days of annoying email blasts and Google-juicing headline techniques to, you know, more boobs. Then HuffPo came along with its lefty megaplex Drudge Report amalgamation which has morphed into the modern day Buzzfeed curating algorithm of business in the front, party in the back (or vice-versa), now considered standard wisdom for some of the bigger publishers. Admittedly, I hate this trend. I hate cats in hot tubs, cats sitting on babies, Keyboard Cats playing off babies who suck at singing, etc. Looking at them is fine. I mostly hate that, at some point, a viral video becomes the default hit-switch for a slow news day. But when your job is to grow a site's traffic, it's tough to ignore — and for the sake of the other writers, it's a necessary cog. To acknowledge this trend of internet strip-mining, we hired Neetzan Zimmerman, founder of The Daily What, to essentially "cover" The Internet for Gawker. His coverage isn't done conventionally, nor is he gravitating to posts he particularly likes: he's tracking what the Internet's hive mind will react to by his own system, which is to me more of a sabermetrician's approach to viral content. I've asked him to outline his formula for both me, but also for readers to show how his method of traffic-generating content is actually employed and why you're reading what you're reading from him on a daily basis — A.J. Daulerio The Most Valuable Content On The Internet: A ManifestoStep 1: Background. In the Summer of 2008 I started a small Tumblr called "The Daily What." It was meant to expand on a feature I had been running on a separate site dedicated to a zine I was self-publishing at the time called Man With Crisis. That feature, "While You Were Working," was just that: A compendium of the most "newsworthy" items of the day, as determined by the Internet. I became increasingly intrigued by what I like to call "the Internet as Value Barometer" — deciding not only what there was to know, but what was worth knowing. Can the wisdom of the crowd be used to determine what warrants attention and what can be willfully ignored? If enough people think some story deserves to be shared, does that automatically make that story more valuable than all the stories not being shared? To put it another way: Do stories that are not being shared even matter? To answer these questions, I first needed to come up with a structured formula for figuring out the Most Valuable Content (MVC) on any given day. Step 2: Experimentation. I started by tracking down the Internet's main sources for MVC. In order to seperate the "listeners" from the "storytellers" I put together two lists: One with all the websites from which content was being culled for dissemination, and another with all the sites doing the disseminating. Examples of the former include big deals like Fark, Reddit, Digg (this was in 2008, mind you), Slashdot, MetaFilter, b3ta, and Oh No They Didn't, as well as lesser-known sites like Super Punch, Cynical-C, Arbroath, and 3 Quarks Daily, that seemed to be a regular source of content for larger, more popular sites. Examples of the latter include Boing Boing, the Gawker Media sites, BuzzFeed, Neatorama, Laughing Squid, and Urlesque. The point was to try and suss out not only where the content was actually coming from (as opposed to where it was ending up), but also to keep track of an item's movements across the web in an effort to pinpoint the exact moment at which it could be defined as having "gone viral." Using an RSS reader to organize my findings, I established a set of categories for each site-type (news, vids, pics, link-sites, general interest, tech, geek, gossip, entertainment, design, art, fashion, and food), and further arranged each site within each category by order of influence. The top tiers were reserved for "mainstream sites" — sites where most of the sharing was occurring (i.e., the content disseminating sites listed above). The lower tiers were reserved for sites that supplied content to top tier sites, but were themselves low on visits. This allowed me to have a streamlined, bottom-up view of content progression: From the lower tiers to the top, where the viral magic happens. In short order I was able to track content from the point of inception to pre-mainstream saturation. I learned to recognize when items were reaching that critical stage of going from radar blip to full-scale red alert. Some of The Daily What's most successful "gets" could be attributed to the employment of this system: Sad Keanu, Nyan Cat, Double Dream Hands, and Gotye's "Somebody That I Used to Know" — which The Daily What posted months before many other major sites became aware of its existence. Step 3: Maintenance. The Internet is mercurial to say the least, and while certain conversation-mongers like Reddit, BuzzFeed, and The Huffington Post are likely here to stay, lower tier sites — the ones that tell them what there is to discuss — change rapidly. In order to stay as current as possible, I make sure to run a spot-check of the most visible sites at least once a week. Refreshing the index with the most fruitful lower tier content sources is only half of it: Losing the dead weight is crucial as well. My rule is simple: If a site hasn't produced at least on item of value during the week, it drops down a tier. If it bottoms out and still hasn't proven useful, it's gone. Step 4: Predictability. At this point, you should be well on your way to gaining a firm grasp on the inner workings of the Internet. So much so, that you don't even need to wait for content to be deemed valuable by a top tier site in order to know it will eventually end up with that designation. Let's review what we've learned so far:
|
|
Black Ops 2 Blows Up E3 and Los Angeles in New Gameplay Footage
June 4th, 2012Top StoryBlack Ops 2 Blows Up E3 and Los Angeles in New Gameplay Footage
|
|