March 27th, 2013Top Story Is Windows Phone Ready to Replace My iPhone or Android? By Whitson Gordon Dear Lifehacker, You guys write a lot about Android and iOS, but what about Windows Phone? I'm in the market for a new smartphone, and I'm open to branching out, but I'm afraid I'll miss some of my favorite apps or features. What should I look out for? I need advice! Sincerely, Waffling Over Windows Dear Waffling, You're right, and you're not the first person to ask this question. Windows Phone doesn't have quite the following that iOS and Android have, so we don't write about it much, but we want to give it a fair shake. So, I got a review unit of the Lumia 920 from Nokia and tried it out for a few weeks. Windows Phone is very different than Android and iOS. Their users don't like to admit it, but Android and iOS are quite similar to each other. They've both taken ideas from each other to improve their OS and have grown more together than they have apart. Windows Phone, on the other hand, is something completely new, which means it takes a bit more getting used to. Here's how Windows Phone differs from its competitors. The Home Screen You're probably familiar with Windows Phone's now-iconic home screen: Instead of multiple screens arranged with rows of icons, it has one home screen called the "Start" screen, with two columns of big tiles that launch apps. You can move these tiles around, resize them, and arrange them in many different ways on the grid. Each tile shows you information (like how many unread SMS messages you have, or your next calendar appointment) so you can always stay up-to-date without having to open an app completely. It doesn't have widgets, but these live tiles are kind of like a halfway point between boring ol' badges and interactive widgets. This layout is very different than iOS and Android, but it doesn't take as much getting used to as you'd think. The tiles are really nice, but can sometimes feel a little too big since you end up having to scroll a lot more. Resizing icons to their smaller versions fixes this somewhat, but of course, the smaller your icons, the less information you can show on each one. That means you have to be strategic: You can shrink down SMS and email since they'll just show you how many unread messages you have, but you might want to keep your weather and calendar icons bigger so they can show you more detailed information. Also, you don't have to put all your apps on your home screen. Like Android, you'll want to put your most used apps on the main screen and hide the rest away in the app drawer that you can access by swiping to the left. In the end, your home screen is what you make it. It may take a bit more work to set up than iOS or Android, but once you've organized your tiles correctly you'll love it. Look and Feel Microsoft did a good job in requiring apps to adhere to specific design standards, which means you don't need to re-learn how to navigate every app (like on Android). The interface is actually quite beautiful, at first glance: it's very fast and smooth, with everything organized into "pages" that you can swipe between (like the views on your calendar, or categories in Evernote). This view isn't for everyone, though. At first, I thought it was gorgeous, but the more I use the phone, the more I feel like all this giant text just wastes space. Take the above image, for example. In Android's Evernote app, I can quickly access my toolbar and go straight to Notes, Notebooks, or Tags. On Windows Phone's Evernote app, the font is so big on the page titles along the top that I can't access Tags as quickly—I have to swipe over multiple times until I get to it. This becomes a bigger problem the more pages you have, and can get annoying. All the big fonts seem like they're wasting horizontal and vertical space. While it may be easier to read the text itself, it means you won't be able to see as many messages in your inbox and you'll have to scroll a lot more. Notifications Windows Phone disappoints when it comes to notifications. Both iOS and Android have fantastic notification systems, letting you view all your recent notifications from a drawer at the top of your screen. Windows Phone doesn't have this. When you first receive a notification, you'll get a little banner at the top of your screen. Tapping on it will take you to the app in question, but if it disappears before you can tap on it—or if you check your phone later—you won't be able to access those notifications anywhere. You'll be able to see the number of unread messages in all your apps from the live tiles on your home screen, but there isn't one central place where you can get a "roundup" of all your recent notifications, which feels really frustrating after you've gotten used to iOS or Android. Multitasking Android and iOS could learn a thing or two from Windows Phone's multitasking abilities. To see your open apps, you just press and hold the back button to view a bunch of thumbnails in a row (kind of like Android's new multitasking system). Tapping on one of those thumbnails resumes the app almost instantaneously. The whole process is extremely smooth. Windows Phone's killer multitasking feature, though, is its control over what runs in the background. If you head to Settings > Applications > Background Tasks, you can tap on a specific third-party app and see what it uses background processes for (usually things like checking for new messages and updating live tiles). If you don't want it working in the background—say, if it's draining battery—you can block it from running those tasks right from this settings screen. This is not only a great feature, but it's incredibly easy to use and understand, which is a breath of fresh air in the smartphone world. Bundled Apps Windows Phone comes with all the usual apps: Email, Calendar, Contacts, Navigation, Internet Explorer, and others. Here's what you'll find in some of the big ones: Email: Windows Phone's email app is pretty basic. After linking your accounts in the Settings app, you can send and receive emails, put them into folders, and flag them. It doesn't have a great conversation view, and viewing other folders takes quite a few taps. It actually feels a little like an older desktop client, and even using Microsoft's awesome Outlook.com service feels like you're using IMAP on a very basic client (which sucks if you're a Gmail user—no archiving here). You can merge all your inboxes into one, if you so choose, which is nice. Calendar: The Calendar app is nothing special. It shows you all of your upcoming appointments in a day view, an agenda view, and has a small to-do list as well. Its month view is awful, showing you your events with very tiny text, without calendar color associated with them, so you can't see anything remotely useful at a glance. It also doesn't sync with Google Calendar, which is a big blow to Google users. People: Your address book is exactly what you'd expect until you sync your phone with social networking accounts like Facebook and Twitter. Then, it'll keep your contacts in sync, show you recent statuses, and become almost like a small all-in-one social network. It's cool, though can get in the way a bit if all you want to do is find someone's phone number. Maps & Navigation: Nokia's HERE maps can not only show you locations on a map, but provide reviews from TripAdvisor, show you what else is nearby, and (of course) give you turn-by-turn directions. Navigation works well, except for the very annoying beeping it makes when you go over the speed limit (which thankfully, you can remove in the settings). HERE's best feature, though, is offline maps. Before you start it up, it'll ask you to download maps for your area, which seems annoying, but allows you to get directions even when you don't have a signal, which helped me on more than one occasion. It's a slightly different approach than Android's offline maps feature, but it's not really better or worse. Internet Explorer: Internet Explorer puts an emphasis on the site you're viewing rather than buttons and other browser features. This is nice, until you want to do something besides refresh the page or go back (you can't go forward, by the way), because everything is in its menu "drawer." From the menu, you can add sites to your favorites list, view your recent history, and open multiple sites at once in "tabs." You can also pin pages to your start screen and find text on a page, though, which is nice. If you dig into IE's settings, you'll find some really nice stuff though. It can grab desktop sites instead of mobile sites, assign different actions to your address bar button, use Google or Bing as your search engine, block cookies, and even open links in a new tab. IE has more settings than I expected to see from a default browser, which is a welcome surprise. Third-Party Apps So, what do you do when your built-in apps are lackluster? You go to the app store! Unfortunately, you've probably heard about how small a selection Windows Phone has, and it's true. It severely lacks the app selection of iOS or Android. You may find an alternative calendar app or two in the Windows Store, but there aren't any awesome standouts like there are on iOS (or even Android). Most are mediocre, or are missing a lot of features compared to their iOS and Android counterparts. Unlike the other platforms, you don't always have a "good" app for any given category. Furthermore, many of our favorite apps—like Wunderlist or Dropbox—are completely missing. Some have third-party alternatives (like Boxfiles for Dropbox), and sometimes they're even good, but it just means that many of you may find yourselves without some of your favorite apps. Many of the big companies we've come to use just haven't made apps for Windows Phone yet (like Google, who has no plans to do so right now), which means if you're even remotely tied into a certain ecosystem (like Google), you're going to have a bad time. Of course, Windows Phone does get some of the little stuff right: you can download trials of paid apps in the Windows store before you buy, which is much appreciated. You can also uninstall many of the preinstalled apps on your phone, which means if you don't want ESPN or AT&T Navigator, you can get rid of them just like you would any other app (get on this, Android). Where Windows Phone Works When I first started using Windows Phone, I thought I'd have more positive things to say about it. It feels really nice when you first start using it, and for the most part, it's easy to use in a way that Android and even iOS can't match. But once I really tried to set myself up on Windows Phone, I realized how many of my go-to apps weren't available, and how frustratingly basic Windows' built-in offerings were. It gets a lot of the little stuff right—like app trials, uninstalling crapware, and speed—but it's failed to provide a lot of the important features available on other platforms. That said, I could still see myself recommending this phone to some people. Much like my experiment with Internet Explorer, many of my gripes tend to be a tad more on the "advanced user" side of things. In my eyes, this Windows Phone is less of a smartphone and more of a dumbphone that can surf the web, send emails, and navigate you around town, without all the apps and other stuff you've come to expect. For some people, that's fine—in fact, it's exactly what they need. I'd recommend this to my less tech-obsessed friends that aren't locked into certain apps, or just want a phone that works. If you want something simple and distraction-free, Windows Phone has potential, but if you like Android and iOS, it's going to be difficult to switch. Not impossible by any means, but difficult. I know we've got a few Windows Phone users out there, and I'd love to hear your experiences. Everyone's different and I know there are going to be a lot of other opinions, workarounds, and features you guys want to talk about, so fire away in the comments below! Title image remixed from Gunnar Assmy (Shutterstock), psdGraphics, psdGraphics, and ShadyLaneDesigns.

We are Katia Beauchamp and Hayley Barna, Founders of Birchbox, and This Is How We Work Gmail's Priority Inbox Is Awesome. Just Give It a Chance Is Windows Phone Ready to Replace My iPhone or Android? View a Negotiation as an Opportunity to Gain Something to Get Over Your Fear of Negotiating The Four Elements of Physical Energy and How To Master Them The Best Antivirus App for Windows [UPDATED] The Best Ways to Be Sure You're Legally Using Online Photos More Stories on Lifehacker »

dwyld.kwu.11muchado2011@blogger.com: Change your e-mail address | Unsubscribe

Gawker Media, 210 Elizabeth Street, Floor 4, New York, NY 10012
Terms of use | Mailing List Policy

March 27th, 2013Top Story DOMA Looks to Be in Serious Trouble in Supreme Court's Second Day of Gay Marriage Hearings By Cord Jefferson Just one day after hearing arguments regarding California's gay marriage ban, the Supreme Court is back in session to consider the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act. DOMA, as it's commonly called, is the act, signed into law by President Clinton in 1996, that restricts the federal government from acknowledging same-sex marriages, even if those unions are recognized in the states of their origin. Whereas yesterday's Prop. 8 hearing saw the needle move only slightly for gay rights, some experts estimated that today's arguments would bring about a more significant change. And if early signals are right, it looks like those experts were correct. *** Before today's DOMA arguments even began, Harvard law professor Vicki Jackson (appointed by the SCOTUS itself) took the floor to share arguments about whether the court could even reasonably hear the DOMA case considering that the Obama administration has called the act unconstitutional. Reuters reported: In the challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act, the court said it would consider whether it could even decide the case, given that President Barack Obama's administration has said that the law is unconstitutional. ... Jackson, who joined Harvard Law School last year from Georgetown University Law Center, will argue that the Obama administration's position strips the Supreme Court of authority over the case. In the wake of Jackson's statements, the conservative justices leapt on the Obama administration for seemingly passing the buck, according to the Wall Street Journal. Conservative justices sharply questioned why the Justice Department is refusing to defend DOMA as unconstitutional but yet enforcing the law and placing the gay-marriage question before the Supreme Court. Justices also questioned whether the case belonged before the court at all. Chief Justice John Roberts told attrorney Sri Srinivasan, the principal deputy solicitor general, that the government's actions were "unprecedented." To agree with a lower court ruling finding DOMA unconstitutional but yet seeking the Supreme Court to weigh in while it enforces the law is "has never been done before," he said. At one point, Chief Justice Roberts even went so far as to say of Obama, "I don't see why he doesn't have the courage of his convictions." The Wall Street Journal also reported that the justices seemed to disagree with Jackson in that they didn't have the authority to decide the DOMA case: Justices asked skeptical questions of Ms. Jackson, suggesting that they didn't buy her arguments that neither the House members who defend DOMA nor the executive branch have an interest in the case. Once they'd moved beyond their standing question, the justices heard Paul Clement, who is representing the House Republicans advocating for DOMA. Clement took tough questions immediately about the potential conflict between DOMA and states' rights, a famous GOP darling. This from Bloomberg: During initial arguments today ... Justice Anthony Kennedy suggested that a federal law that doesn't recognize gay marriages that are legal in some states can create conflicts. "You are at real risk of running in conflict" with the "essence" of state powers, Kennedy said. Justice Ginsburg, a liberal member of the court, likened gay marriages not recognized federally—and thus left out of certain benefits—as "skim-milk" marriages. "One might well ask, what kind of marriage is this?" she said. Justice Sotomayor also joined in this line of inquiry. SOTOMAYOR also asks about federalism: "What gives fed govt right to be concerned at all abt what definition of marriage is?" — Jan Crawford (@JanCBS) March 27, 2013 Click to view One of the main cruxes of Clement's responses was that the federal government has very good reason to want uniform treatment of marriages, regardless of in which state those marriages take place: Mr. Clement said the federal government has a particularly acute interest in couples being treated equally across state lines. That wouldn't happen if same-sex couples in states with gay marriage could receive federal benefits, while same-sex couples in other states could not. It was rational, he said, for Congress to treat all same-sex couples the same. When it was Solicitor General Donald Verrilli's turn to speak, he attempted to steer the conversation away from the states' rights and tax benefits discussion and toward the discriminatory genesis of DOMA. The law isn't the "Federal Uniform Definition of Marriage Act," he told the court. "It's called the Defense of Marriage Act." Justice Kagan took Verilli's suggestion of prejudice and ran with it, according to the Huffingon Post: Justice Elena Kagan pushed a similar point. She told Clement ... "that maybe Congress had something different in mind than uniformity" in the definition of marriage. Suggesting the law was "infected with prejudice, fear, spite, and animus," Kagan read a portion of the House Report, which said DOMA was meant to reflect Congress' "collective moral judgment and to express moral disapproval of homosexuality." *** In the end, the general consensus from legal analysts was that DOMA is in trouble, though there seemed to be a difference of opinion on the Court about why exactly DOMA should be struck down: Final update: #scotus 80% likely to strike down #doma. J Kennedy suggests it violates states' rights; 4 other Justices see as gay rights. — SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) March 27, 2013 Click to view #doma in trouble at #scotus. Kennedy suggests it violates states' rights. #ssm — Jeffrey Toobin (@JeffreyToobin) March 27, 2013 Click to view Writing at the SCOTUS Blog, Lyle Denniston said that DOMA very well "may be gone, after a seventeen-year existence." Though Denniston warned that gay-rights advocates should be sure to temper their excitement: Along with sharply negative comments about DOMA by the Court's four more liberal members, Kennedy's stance could put the law on the edge of constitutional extinction. But, if the Court were to do that based on states' rights premises, the final ruling might not say much at all about whether same-sex couples were any closer to gaining an equal right to marry under the Constitution. In other words, we are moving forward, but slowly enough that it can sometimes feel like we're frustratingly stationary. Here, if you're interested, is audio if the SCOTUS hearing on DOMA. And here is the hearing transcript in full. Click to view Click to view [Image from Getty.]

DOMA Looks to Be in Serious Trouble in Supreme Court's Second Day of Gay Marriage Hearings How a Massive Online War Waged by Dutch 'Spammers' in a Military Bunker Could Take Down the Internet Source: Justin Bieber Spit on His Neighbor Yesterday This Guy Won a Supreme Court Case This Morning Reality TV Star Wants Unflattering Photo Removed from the Web, Goes About It Like a Prick Terrifying Footage of Man Swallowed by Four-Story Sinkhole Captured on Camera That Esquire Story About The SEAL Who Killed Osama Bin Laden Is "Complete B.S." According to Another SEAL [UPDATE] More Stories on Gawker »

dwyld.kwu.11muchado2011@blogger.com: Change your e-mail address | Unsubscribe

Gawker Media, 210 Elizabeth Street, Floor 4, New York, NY 10012
Terms of use | Mailing List Policy

New Tiger Controversy -- Johnny Football Quits Twitter -- NFL Player Has $500K Stolen

Sports and Pop Culture Edition

Most Talented Headcases in Sports Right Now BleacherReport.com Twitter Bids Farewell to Johnny Football BleacherReport.com Ugliest Breakups in Sports BleacherReport.com RG3 Plays Catch with a Circus Elephant BleacherReport.com High School Phenom Just Dropped an Incredible Hoops Mixtape BroBible.com Tiger Angers Fans with New Nike Ad BleacherReport.com Is That Raiders' LT Jared Veldheer, or Is It the Hulk? BleacherReport.com Most Bizarre Lucky Charms in Sports BleacherReport.com Ouch: Shaun Rogers Has $500K Worth of Jewelry Stolen BleacherReport.com Watch: Mr. T Scores from Center-Ice BleacherReport.com Most Iconic Poses in Sports BleacherReport.com Mexican Fans Throw Beers at Americans During Shocking Draw SportsGrid.com Phil Mickelson Hits RIDICULOUS Flop Shot BleacherReport.com Check Out Chris Paul's INSANE Shoe Collection BleacherReport.com Weirdest Sports and the Athletes Who'd Be Great at Them BleacherReport.com Manny's Eventful Chinese League Debut BleacherReport.com Visit BleacherReport.com for more Coverage » Get all the latest coverage: Like us on Facebook Download Team Stream App Follow on @BleacherReport Subscribe on YouTube Follow B/R on Google Plus College Football Recruiting Big Ten Basketball College Basketball NBA NFL We're looking for talented Sports and Pop Culture fans to write for Bleacher Report! Sign Up To Write! Feel free to send any feedback or suggestions to feedback@bleacherreport.com. If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, you may manage your subscriptions. If you no longer wish to receive any Bleacher Report newsletters, you may unsubscribe. Copyright © 2011 Bleacher Report, 153 Kearny Street, 2nd floor, San Francisco, CA 94108