RefBan

Referral Banners

Thursday, September 13, 2012

How to Get Off the Upgrade Treadmill and Stop Wasting Money on New Tech

September 13th, 2012Top Story

How to Get Off the Upgrade Treadmill and Stop Wasting Money on New Tech

By Thorin Klosowski

How to Get Off the Upgrade Treadmill and Stop Wasting Money on New TechEvery year hardware manufacturers release new iterations of their products. From Apple to Samsung to Nintendo, the upgrade treadmill never ends. So, why do we feel the need to buy into it every year? We'll show you why you get stuck on the upgrade treadmill, and how to be happy with what you have.

At Amazon's recent press conference for the new Kindle Fire, CEO Jeff Bezos calls the phenomonon of constant new gadgets the "upgrade treadmill:"

We don't need you to be on the upgrade treadmill. If we made our money when people bought the device, we'd be rolling out programs left and right to try to get you to upgrade. In fact, we're happy that people are still using Kindle Ones that are five years old. They're still reading on them, and every time they buy a book, that's good for us. That's alignment.

For Amazon, hardware doesn't really matter because they make their money from content. But Bezos' point still remains: that upgrade treadmill is something most of us are caught on. It's not just tablets, it's everything: game systems, phones, TVs, appliances—when a new shiny gadget comes, most of us turn into a precious-obsessed Gollum. Why do we do this? And more importantly, how can we get off the treadmill and enjoy what we already own?

Why We Feel the Need to Upgrade

How to Get Off the Upgrade Treadmill and Stop Wasting Money on New TechRegardless of how much willpower we all have, most of us think briefly about an upgrade. According to financial weblog The Simple Dollar, this is at least partially because of the primacy and recency effect:

The primacy effect means that people tend to remember the first information presented about something better than information presented later.

For example, let's say that your first awareness of a product was during a segment on a morning show, where they lauded how well the product worked. If you were paying attention, that information is more likely to stick in your head ("this product is good and does the job well") than information you find out later on about the product.

However, there is something that trumps the primacy effect: the recency effect means that people tend to remember the most recent information presented about a product above all else.

What the Simple Dollar is saying is that we overvalue the new because it's the last thing presented to us. We tend to forget the old information (that the old product is also great) and supplement it with the new (that the new product is "more great"). We also want new things because the brain likes getting the rush. Psychology Today explains how:

First, a quick neuroscience lesson: The brain balances the desire for shiny new things with their cost. Observing something to buy activates the brain's "wanting system" that makes getting things feel good. But, the Rolling Stones reminded us that we can't always get what we want. The brain reacts to prices by activating brain regions that make us feel pain. The information from the wanting and pain systems are relayed to the prefrontal cortex where a cost-benefit calculation is made to determine if you should buy that new pair of Valentino slide sandals for $675 or keep your cash for some other use.

In a way, the cost-benefit calculation is supposed to keep your brain in check so you don't make an unneeded purchase. However, with the upgrade treadmill, and the hype that inevitably surrounds a new product, it's really easy to get caught up in it all and make a quick decision without thinking the decision through. Photo by David Fulmer.

Why Not Upgrade?

How to Get Off the Upgrade Treadmill and Stop Wasting Money on New TechHolding that new shiny piece of equipment in your hand is a gadget geeks heaven, but it's a fleeting feeling. After a week, you might have even stopped using the protective case, quit dusting it everyday, and barely even notice all the fingerprints on it.

Nowadays, the bulk of upgrades are incremental. While sometimes an upgrade will really change the course of a device, more often it's a tiny sliver of a change that's only exciting because the manufacturer tells us it's exciting. The bulk of our technology hasn't changed that much in the last few years—a four year old HDTV is thick, but has the same amount of pixels as a new one, an iPhone 4 is still a fantastic phone capable of running the same apps the new iPhone 5 can.

In most cases (not all, of course), an upgrade is a luxury, but not a requirement. More often than not, what you have will do the trick. Photo by Collin Anderson.

Make the Most of What You Have

How to Get Off the Upgrade Treadmill and Stop Wasting Money on New TechJust because a company releases a new product it doesn't mean your old stuff is outdated. In fact, as we've shown time and time again, you can get most new features on the devices you already have using already available software. Sure, your hardware might not be new, but your old stuff can perform nearly all the same functions as a new one can.

For instance, a cheap camera can get an upgrade with a little hacking, and a Nook can become an Android tablet. Even your computer is easy to upgrade if you know which upgrades really matter. If your laptop is just sluggish, an extreme makeover takes no time at all. Photo by Mark Skipper.

Compare and Contrast What You Already Have with What You Want

How to Get Off the Upgrade Treadmill and Stop Wasting Money on New TechIt sounds simple, but a quick comparison chart between what you already own, and what you want is a really easy way to get rid of the recency effect.

Before you start your comparison chart, take a look at the device you're thinking about upgrading. Ask yourself how you use it. I'll give you the example of me and my iPad: 90% of my time with my iPad is spent reading Kindle books. Should I upgrade to another iPad? Probably not, since it isn't going to read those Kindle books any better than my current one (if anything, it'd make more sense to "downgrade" to a Kindle—but of course that'd still cost money). How you think you'll use a product when you first purchase it is often radically different than how you actually use it when it's in your hands. Before blindly upgrading, ask yourself, "Have my needs changed? Does this upgrade fill that hole?"

When you're really on the fence about an upgrade, or just need to talk yourself out of one, start writing a list. In one column, write what you don't like about your old device. In the next column, write down what the upgrade has fixed. More often than not you'll realize it's not really worth it.

Of course, that's not always the case. For instance, upgrading appliances can often save you money over the long term. Other times, minor upgrades, like a significantly better battery life, or screen, or whatever else, are enough to justify an upgrade for you personally. The point is that you think critically about upgrading as opposed to just doing it because you can. Photo by Zhao !.

Break Your Brand Loyalty and Decide What You Really Need

How to Get Off the Upgrade Treadmill and Stop Wasting Money on New TechWe've talked about brand loyalty before, and it's an important factor to consider anytime you're thinking about upgrading. More often than not, the first inclination to upgrade is all about the recency effect. A company you tend to like has a new product, you need said product. Part of the upgrade treadmill is getting locked into brand loyalty, blindly upgrading and refusing to look for other options. But do you really need their product? Or will another do?

Take Apple for example. The reason they keep their iPhones and iPads locked to iTunes isn't just about controlling the product. It's about controlling the infrastructure. To walk away from an iPhone you have to abandon everything you've already invested in it. This makes an upgrade to another one of their devices feel like the logical solution.

Or at least, that's how it seems. With the exception of apps, walking away from Apple (or Android, or anything else) is made to seem complicated. But it's often not as bad as we think. Provided you're using third party services (any apps that sync to the cloud, Kindle, etc), you can almost always migrate your data easily. Even switching from an iPhone to an Android isn't that bad (or vice versa). Photo by Mike Lau.


The upgrade treadmill isn't always a bad thing. Some devices and gadgets get major upgrades that appeal to you directly. Others are less interesting. The point is to stop and really think about what you need. Just because hardware manufacturers are on a schedule for upgrades doesn't mean their upgrades are worth making. If your gear is still working for you, don't let a company tell you when it's time to upgrade.

Title image remixed from Diamond_Images (Shutterstock).

Number of comments

Everything You Need to Know About The Wii U (That Nintendo Was Willing To Tell Us)

September 13th, 2012Top Story

Everything You Need to Know About The Wii U (That Nintendo Was Willing To Tell Us)

By Stephen Totilo

Everything You Need to Know About The Wii U (That Nintendo Was Willing To Tell Us)The new Wii is called the Wii U. It's coming out in America on November 18 and will cost $299, not counting hidden costs.

Nintendo blasted out a ton of news about it today. But they didn't tell us everything.

Here's What We Know

  • It's $299, for the basic version that includes the console (which is way more powerful than the Wii and somewhere in the ballpark of the PS3/Xbox360, give or take... probably better, not worse), the GamePad (the signature of the system, a controller with a 6.2-inch screen, two analog thumbsticks, a forward-facing camera, a bunch of face buttons and a gyro sensor), 8GB of on-board memory, AC adapters for the console and controller, a sensor bar (take that, Japan) and—surprise!—an HDMI cable. It's white. It does not come with any Wii Remotes, which will be used in many multiplayer games. Hopefully you have some. They need to be Wii Remote Pluses. Want the full specs? Here you go.
  • It's also $349.99. That's if you buy the Deluxe Set, which has all of the above, though with 32GB of on-board memory, a console stand, a charging cradle for the GamePad and a membership in something called the Deluxe Digital Promotion (DDP!), which will provide discounts for digital downloads, through 2014. The Deluxe version comes with Wii U flagship game Nintendo Land packed in.
  • They made a thing for it called TVii that is both a crime against the English language and a new service for letting users watch streaming video from sources like Hulu, Netflix and YouTube on the Wii U GamePad, even if someone else in the house is using the TV that the Wii U is hooked up to. It'll even pull stuff that was DVR'd on your TiVo.
  • You'll be able to play the next Call of Duty on the system, and, better, this game, Black Ops II will let you play split-screen across your TV and the screen on the GamePad. Here's proof.
  • Bayonetta 2 will be exclusive for the Wii U. We don't know when it's coming out, but the sequel to the super-sexy action game isn't just a steal from the Xbox/PlayStation playbook but a potential answer to the question: "What will grandmas enjoy on the new Wii?"
  • Nintendo Land and New Super Mario Bros. U are Nintendo's only confirmed launch day games (man, there better be more). Nintendo Land is a virtual theme park of Nintendo-themed attractions includes a cool Metroid riff.
  • New Super Mario Bros. U looks awesome.
  • Nintendo has declared that some 50 games will be out in the system's launch window, which opens on November 18 and closes on March 31. Those games include ZombiU, Pikmin 3, Wonderful 101 (Formerly Project 100, Assassin's Creed III, Mass Effect 3, New Super Mario Bros. U, Lego City Undercover, Wii Fit U and a lot more. Here's the whole list.
  • There will be a new Wii U game from the people who made Xenoblade and a Warriors Orochi game. Also, Monster Hunter 3 Ultimate
  • The Wii U will offer a sort of gamer's social network called MiiVerse.
  • GameStop will take your current Wii of your hands for $50.
  • And now we know the price of games, catching up with the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 at $59.99

Here's What We Don't Know (Yet)

  • Which games are actually coming out on launch day, other than Nintendo Land?
  • The cost of a second GamePad. No launch games appear to support one, but the system can. Maybe Nintendo held this back from America after revealing that an extra GamePad will cost an extraordinary half of the cost of a basic Wii U bundle in Japan (which, if you do the math, means that the controller kind of actually costs the same as the console sans packed-in controller.)
  • The cost of Wii Remote Pluses? These will be required for multiplayer in Nintendo Land games and will be the preferred controller option, along with the Wii Nunchuk, for many games. Remote Pluses go for $40 now. The tech is getting old, so maybe Nintendo will cut people a break? Or they'll assume they have them from their Wiis.

We'll have plenty more about Wii U in the hours and days to come. We've got people playing the system right now!

Number of comments

The Deadliest Poisons in History (And Why People Stopped Using Them)

September 13th, 2012Top Story

The Deadliest Poisons in History (And Why People Stopped Using Them)

By Esther Inglis-Arkell

The Deadliest Poisons in History (And Why People Stopped Using Them)Once people figured out they could kill each other with special substances instead of sharp sticks, the proverbial poison cookie was born. However, there are only so many times you can use the same trick. As people caught on to how poisons worked, and moved them to the forefront of investigations, certain poisons fell out of fashion. We'll take a look at the glory days of them all.

Sometimes when we look around our lives we can't help but think - this situation would be greatly improved with the use of a little poison. After all, can every last one of the Borgias be wrong? Modern day people are not the first to come around to this way of thinking.

Greeks and Romans: Hemlock and Aconite

The Deadliest Poisons in History (And Why People Stopped Using Them) It's best to start with the classics. When people didn't know where else to turn, they turned to hemlock. It's most famous for being the poison that Socrates drank in the spirit of good citizenship. It would not have been a particularly pleasant death. Accounts of his death say it was peaceful, with feeling going out of his legs first, and the eventual numbness killing him. Actually, hemlock acts as a paralytic that keeps the mind awake. It takes out the muscles and then shuts down the respiratory system, so death comes from waking asphyxiation.

Aconite comes from the plant monkshood. It, reportedly, also has a famous casualty. The emperor Claudius was said to have been poisoned by his wife by aconite in a plate of mushrooms. The wife part of that scenario seems to be an anomaly since aconite was known as "The Mother-In-Law's Poison." It first caused vomiting and diarrhea, and then caused arrhythmic heart function until the person died.

Hemlock and aconite were a great favorite of the Greeks and the Romans. They didn't just poison each other with the direct version of hemlock, but tried to do each other in with the meat of larks, which were said to eat so much hemlock that their flesh was poisonous. Why did they favor these plants so much? Well, it was also given by doctors to ease swelling and calm seizures or muscle spasms. Aconite was a treatment for head colds by doctors - right up until the 20th century. As meticulous as poisoners seem, they often use whatever comes to hand when they need to kill someone. Since they could get hold of both of these poisons and have a seemingly innocent reason for using them, they were ideal. They fell out of favor often because they weren't nearby. Over time, the effects of the poison became known. Occasional throw-back poisoners tried to use them, but as one unlucky Victorian poisoner who had gotten his entire education from a classics textbook found out, medical science moves forward. His "undetectable aconite," was well-known as a poison. Being a poisoner is very much about staying ahead of the curve.

Medieval Peasants: Belladonna and Mandrake

Belladonna gets its name because it's said that peasant women used to rub it in their eyes. It's a paralytic, and would take out the muscles used to constrict their pupils. When they put it on their cheeks it would cause their faces to flush with what looked like blush. They believed that this gave them a dreamy look that was sexy to men. Probably it just tipped the men off that these women knew how to get their hands on some belladonna. Some say that this was the actual poison used on Claudius by his wife. Others say that Macbeth poisoned an entire invading army with it. One of its most famous uses was as a hallucinogenic that witches used on themselves to give them the feeling of flying. When too much was used - and too much can mean a single leaf - people get nauseous, hallucinate, then develop a rapid pulse that trickles down to nothing.

The Deadliest Poisons in History (And Why People Stopped Using Them) Mandrake poisonings occurred everywhere, but were most common where the European mandrake grew, in Spain and Portugal. This type of mandrake flowers and bears edible fruit. The roots, however, are not to be eaten. Nor do they need to be in order to be poisonous. Today extracts from the root are used to take off warts - with the warning not to expose healthy skin to the compound. Early poisoners didn't issue that warning. Mandrake will take out the liver and kidneys, so wasn't necessarily as fast as others, but it was a great way to dispose of someone without needing to cook for them.

Mandrake and belladonna were, again, commonly used by certain people during a certain time period because they had them close by and no one would blame them for being in possession of them. As the population moved to the city, it became less common to harvest mandrake or inconspicuously maintain a ten foot high belladonna bush. Besides, as industrialization came on, well, there were new opportunities.

(For those of you wondering about digitalis - foxglove - it is surprisingly hard to give someone a lethal dose of it. Modern poisonings are generally only serious when the victim is a young child. It's also time-consuming to distill, which makes a poisoning with it hard to pull off when a family shares a kitchen.)

Ladies and Gentlemen of Industry: Strychnine, Cyanide, and Arsenic

Cyanide is everywhere. It's in the foods we eat. It's in the chemicals around us. Although substances that contained cyanide were used well back in history, it wasn't until 1782, when a Swedish chemist named Scheele distilled hydrogen cyanide, that things really got swinging. It was first used in distinctive blue paints, but once it was discovered that cyanide killed people quickly - and generally painlessly - that it was used by the military to poison people on both sides. Spies famously used cyanide capsules to kill themselves quickly if caught. It brings on unconsciousness first, followed by convulsions, the inability to absorb oxygen, and death. This was the poison that killed (or didn't kill!) Rasputin. Its quickness and effectiveness at first worked it its favor, but soon people caught on. Lizzie Borden might have been convicted if it had been widely known that she had been asking at chemist after chemist for "prussic acid" - another name for hydrogen cyanide - just days before her parents were axed to death. The testimony of the chemists was thrown out of court on a technicality and she was found not guilty. The reason she couldn't get it was, even in an era in which people could buy heroin over-the-counter, it had been involved in too many poisonings. Sadly, it is still used sometimes by the kind of people who don't care if everyone knows their victim has been poisoned.

The Deadliest Poisons in History (And Why People Stopped Using Them) Strychnine took some time to catch on the west. It was known as a poison (and a possible medicine) in China and India for centuries, but only made its way to Europe in the late 1700s, when people brought over the Strychnos nux-vomica tree. It took even longer for the toxic compound in the seeds to be isolated and distilled. Once it did, it became a poison for birds in the country and rats in the city. That meant had the major quality that every poisoner looks for - it was within reach. This was not a way to poison someone you like. It causes uncontrollable muscle spasms, frothing at the mouth, reflexes that are dramatically greater than the stimuli that produce them, and eventual death from asphyxiation when the muscles are too tensed and erratic to allow for breathing. The first case in England was of a Doctor William Palmer, who killed his gambling associates with strychnine, even though, as a doctor in 1856, he should have been able to get his hands on better stuff. Thomas Neil Cream was next. He was convicted for poisoning a number of prostitutes, and said he had killed more as Jack the Ripper just before he was hanged. Agatha Christie made this poison famous in her first murder mystery, The Mysterious Affair at Styles. Overall, though, it was so quick and so dramatic that it was hard for a murderer to get away with the crime. Now companies that make animal poison often put compounds that dye or flavor food in strychnine so that it can't be consumed.

Arsenic is, in the end, the be-all and end-all of historic poisons. Without a doubt it had the longest run. Technically, it should be back there among the Romans, because it was used even in antiquity. It was called the King of Poisons, and was the favorite of the Borgias. But it wasn't until the Victorian era when it got its queen. Or rather, queens. Though it was said to have Napoleon and a good chunk of the Italian clergy, this eventually became the lady's poison. Women used arsenic, which constricts the veins, to do the opposite of what medieval women did with belladonna. They wanted a white-as-snow, composed face. Girls learned about the properties and dangers of arsenic in school from their friends, and they were very used to carrying it around and dissolving it in liquids to bathe their faces in. It was tasteless, colorless, and odorless. A few grains of the stuff could kill a man. And a few grains did kill many, many men. (Women, to be fair, weren't the only ones to do this. It's been said that an overly harsh arctic exploration leader, Charles Francis Hall, was poisoned by his own men using arsenic.)

The Deadliest Poisons in History (And Why People Stopped Using Them) The most infamous case of arsenic poisoning came in 1857, and involved one Madeleine Smith. She had taken a lover, who had turned out to be a blackmailing fortune-hunter. When he threatened to go to her father and show him the explicit love-letters that Madeleine had written, Madeleine made nice and invited him to have some cocoa with her on her windowsill after her father was in bed. The lover fell ill, but was good enough to return the next night, when he got the next dose of cocoa. They found over seventy grains of arsenic in his stomach, and a letter from Madeleine asking him to meet her in his pocket. Madeleine was declared innocent - through a wild series of lucky chances for her - but people checked their drinks around her so much that she changed her name and went to America. The Smith trial, and the fact that medical science had advanced to the point where it was possible to count the grains of arsenic in a corpse's stomach, marked the end of a long era. Arsenic was most on-hand in Victorian era, but it had endured because of its invisibility before and after it was used. The effects of arsenic - sweating, confusion, cramping muscles, and stomach pain - could be written off as extreme food poisoning. Not anymore. And because the news of the trial reached across countries and continents, no aspiring poisoner could fail to note how very obvious arsenic poisonings had become. The king was dead.

Belladonna Image: Rillke

Via Mental Floss, UCL, Belladonnakillz, Mason, PLOS, Dartmouth.

Number of comments