Now playing: Slate V, a video-only site from the world's leading online magazine. Visit Slate V at www.slatev.com. | |
Brow Beat Do Hugo and The Artist have a Movie-About-Movies Advantage? Posted Friday, Dec 02, 2011, at 08:59 PM ET The National Board of Review named Hugo the best film of 2011 on Thursday. On Tuesday, the New York Film Critics Circle gave The Artist its Best Picture award. Over at Grantland, Oscarmetrics columnist Mark Harris offered three ways of looking at the National Board of Review's selection. I'd like to offer one more: Do movie critics—along with many diehard movie lovers, not to mention movie makers—have a bias towards movies about movies? To continue reading, click here. Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum What did you think of this article? POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES Also In Slate Why Won't South Hadley Say How Much It Paid Phoebe Prince's Family? Herman Cain Prepares To Blame His Wife for the End of His Campaign Shame: Can Michael Fassbender's Sterling Performance Save This Mediocre Movie? | Advertisement |
Manage your newsletters subscription: Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Advertising Information | |
Ideas on how to make something better? Send an e-mail to slatenewsletter@nl.slate.com. Copyright 2011 The Slate Group | Privacy Policy |
A destination on the Interweb to brighten your day (now get back to work!)
Friday, December 2, 2011
Arts: Do Hugo and The Artist have a Movie-About-Movies Advantage?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment