sports nut More Moneyball, Same Problems The numbers are good, but the story is still bunk. Posted Wednesday, Sept. 21, 2011, at 1:01 PM ET
Statistically savvy baseball fans who are familiar with the debates that have taken place in the wake of Moneyball may think they know where I'm going with this. I'm about to say: "The real reason Oakland won all those games from 2001-03 was because they had these three great pitchers, whom everyone knew were going to be good--not just the A's front office that, thanks to general manager Billy Beane, preferred computers and number-crunchers to professional scouts. Beane isn't so great," I'll conclude, "and statistics don't tell you much. Just look at the A's record lately." To continue reading, click here. David Haglund is the managing editor of PEN America. Follow him on Twitter.Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum What did you think of this article? POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES Also In Slate Sorry, Republicans, but the Law Says the Federal Reserve Can Do Whatever It Wants How the Moneyball Movie Perpetuates the Myth That Oakland Reinvented Itself With Stats Alone The Billion Bunny March, the Snack Glory Hole, and Other Really Weird Stuff at Burning Man | Advertisement |
Manage your newsletters subscription: Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Advertising Information | |
Ideas on how to make something better? Send an e-mail to slatenewsletter@nl.slate.com. Copyright 2011 The Slate Group | Privacy Policy |
A destination on the Interweb to brighten your day (now get back to work!)
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Sports Nut: More Moneyball, Same Problems
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment