July 18th, 2012Top StoryHow The Knicks Could Afford Jeremy Lin, And Other Questions AnsweredBy Barry Petchesky Thanks to everybody who sent in questions—which is none of you, because I never told you to send them in. So I made up some of my own, and answered them. This all has to be resolved by tonight, right? Why the stalling? The initial dodges in Vegas were to buy team to get the trade for Raymond Felton done, so the Knicks wouldn't be up against the wall. But now, this waiting until the last second, the rationale is anyone's guess. It could be the Knicks taking all the time they're allotted (and then some) to actually make their decision. Or it could just be gamesmanship. If they do end up matching Lin, the Rockets would be still need to find a point guard—and there aren't many left. Wouldn't all the Jeremy Lin merchandise sold easily cover the cost of signing him? There's more than just jerseys, though. Linsanity was a boon for ratings, and road gates, and general fan interest in New York, America and Asia, all of which indirectly put money in Jim Dolan's pockets. (Attendance isn't an issue—the Knicks always sell out.) At the height of Linsanity, MSG's market cap rose the equivalent of $71 million. Yesterday, on news that Lin would probably not be returning, the market cap dropped by $49 million. Even that should be taken with a grain of salt, however. The market is notoriously reactionary—think a drunk guy or ESPN talking head declaring Lin the greatest point guard ever after a month of action. It's seen larger swings and corrections before Jeremy Lin ever signed with New York, and after his injury put him out of action. Still, there's no denying the Knicks with Jeremy Lin are more valuable than the Knicks with Raymond Felton. How much more valuable is something the front office has likely spent the last few days crunching. Why didn't the Knicks just give Lin a fair offer to begin with? Are there ways the Knicks can match Lin's deal, but trade him before the "poison pill" third year? It would be even more complicated if Jeremy Lin is still a star in two years. The Knicks could be hard-pressed to find a team willing to take him on in the last year of his deal without assurances he'll stick around. But the Knicks, as a luxury taxpaying team, won't be able to do sign-and-trades—meaning any team that trades for Lin will be getting an expensive rental. Any other ways? What about the petition? |
|
A destination on the Interweb to brighten your day (now get back to work!)
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
How The Knicks Could Afford Jeremy Lin, And Other Questions Answered
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment