January 23rd, 2013Top StoryThe NAACP Pretends That Sugary Soda Is a Civil Rights IssueBy Hamilton Nolan
The AP reported today that both the NAACP and the Hispanic Federation have joined the American Beverage Association's lawsuit against Bloomberg's proposal to limit sodas to 16 ounces in the city. They have joined on the side of the beverage industry, to be clear, which should be disconcerting to anyone under the impression that the NAACP still operates as a righteous group of crusading outsiders dedicated to justice, as they did during the civil rights era. Sadly, that's not the reality any more. Like any big, powerful institution, the NAACP has settled into a role as part of the establishment. That's not to say that it doesn't support good causes or do good things any more; it's just to point out that it is well ensconced on the list of go-to places for corporate America to turn when they want to receive an Official Blessing From The Minority Community. All great social justice organizations run this risk, if they hang around long enough. They become less likely to picket Wal-Mart, and more likely to be showered with money by Wal-Mart. Just as environmental groups can be enlisted for corporate "greenwashing," so can civil rights be enlisted for corporate blackwashing. They are relatively cheap line items in a PR budget. For a donation, companies can officially place themselves on the side of civil rights and justice, even if they don't belong there. The Hispanic Federation's annual gala is April 11, at the Waldorf-Astoria. There, they will present their "Corporate Leadership Award" to The Coca-Cola Company, which is among their funders. The NAACP has recently received a $100,000 donation from the Coca-Cola foundation, along with another $35K to the NAACP New York State Conference. They recently gave an image award to PepsiCo (which will doubtless be repaid with donations). It's quite easy for large nonprofits such as these to ensure a robust roster of future corporate funding: all they have to do is scratch these companies' backs when called upon. This is what happens with civil rights organizations become co-opted by corporate interests:
And why do these alleged civil rights organizations feel strongly enough about soda size, of all things, to call out their lawyers? Because "minority-owned delis and corner stores will end up at a disadvantage compared to grocery chains." The difficulties involved in restocking the shelves at your corner bodega are more important than the entire obesity issue in the black and Latino communities, by this pretend logic. Conjuring an objection to a health program out of the flimsiest of fabric, in order to try to undermine a program that would help to address a problem plaguing the very communities that these groups are supposed to serve. Neither the NAACP nor the Hispanic Federation have any logical reason whatsoever to be involved in the minutiae of beverage size regulation. If they do decide to enter the debate, it should be on the side of the people they're supposed to help. But the people don't write the biggest checks. [Image by Jim Cooke] |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment