|
A destination on the Interweb to brighten your day (now get back to work!)
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Top Stories from the last 24 hours
Police Seize Vehicle of Missing Maine Girl's Father
Reuters Health Report
If you are having trouble viewing this email or would like to view it in your web browser, CLICK HERE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/20/2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Politics: What If He Wins?
Now playing: Slate V, a video-only site from the world's leading online magazine. Visit Slate V at www.slatev.com. | |
Politics What If He Wins? Imagining a Ron Paul victory in Iowa. By David Weigel Posted Monday, Dec 19, 2011, at 11:34 PM ET Jan. 3, 2012. The ballroom of the Des Moines hotel fills faster than anyone expected. Iowa Republicans are still caucusing, but fans of Ron Paul have driven in from Omaha, Rockford, Minneapolis, Topeka, and Pittsburgh, their cars festooned with "Legalize the Constitution" stickers. They hit the cash bars early. At 8 p.m., the networks release the first scraps from "entrance polls." Lots of first-time caucusers. Lots and lots of anti-Washington sentiment. Lots and lots of Tea Partiers. The ballroom crowd boos when some cable-news Muppet explains that "some people are saying that a Ron Paul win would mark the end of the Iowa caucuses." Suddenly they realize why the anchor is saying that: He's trying to explain why Paul is leading. At 9 p.m., they call it: "Ron Paul is the winner of the 2012 Iowa caucuses." The ballroom fills up with confetti and boozy cheers. The 76-year-old candidate takes the stage, joined by the junior senator from Kentucky and the rest of his brood. Those hair-gelled media nabobs will have to report on a new Republican front-runner now. This could happen. Two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the Republican wheel of random candidate surges has finally click-clack-clicked over to Ron Paul. A Fox News columnist says it. A CNN columnist says it. The heartless RealClearPolitics polling average says it, even if it's goosed by an odd, one-day Insider Advantage survey. The gamblers of InTrade, who don't often move unless they've got a preponderance ... To continue reading, click here. Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum What did you think of this article? POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES Also In Slate Lithwick: Newt Gingrich's Insanely Stupid Attack on the Judicial Branch How To Negotiate for a Better Salary True Fact: Greeks and Italians Work Way Harder Than Germans Do | Advertisement |
Manage your newsletters subscription: Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Advertising Information | |
Ideas on how to make something better? Send an e-mail to slatenewsletter@nl.slate.com. Copyright 2011 The Slate Group | Privacy Policy |
Arts: The Anti-Hero of Young Adult Isn?t Unlikable, She?s Mentally Ill
Now playing: Slate V, a video-only site from the world's leading online magazine. Visit Slate V at www.slatev.com. | |
Brow Beat The Anti-Hero of Young Adult Isn't "Unlikable," She's Mentally Ill Posted Tuesday, Dec 20, 2011, at 06:21 PM ET There's an odd line in Roger Ebert's otherwise mostly astute review of Young Adult, the new movie written by Diablo Cody, directed by Jason Reitman, and starring Charlize Theron as Mavis Gary, a YA-fiction writer who goes back to her hometown to seduce her high school boyfriend away from his wife and new baby. Ebert points out, rightly, that Mavis is an alcoholic, then claims that "civilians (and some of the critics writing about this film) are slow to recognize alcoholism." That's not the odd line. I suspect he's right—and Ebert, who has written candidly and at length about his own alcoholism, knows the subject better than most. He goes on to say that Mavis's alcoholism "explains a lot of things: her single status, her disheveled apartment, her current writer's block, her lack of self-knowledge, her denial, her inappropriate behavior. Diablo Cody," Ebert says, "was wise to include it; without such a context, Mavis would simply be insane." That's the odd line. What does Ebert mean by "simply insane," exactly? I suspect he means that if we didn't have alcoholism to explain Mavis's bad behavior, her actions would make no sense—she would be "insane" in a manner similar to, say, the Joker as played by Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight, a character beyond human understanding, whose wild actions are essentially divorced from human psychology. He is using the term very differently, in other words, from the way Maureen ... To continue reading, click here. Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum What did you think of this article? POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES Also In Slate Lithwick: Newt Gingrich's Insanely Stupid Attack on the Judicial Branch How To Negotiate for a Better Salary True Fact: Greeks and Italians Work Way Harder Than Germans Do | Advertisement |
Manage your newsletters subscription: Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Advertising Information | |
Ideas on how to make something better? Send an e-mail to slatenewsletter@nl.slate.com. Copyright 2011 The Slate Group | Privacy Policy |