RefBan

Referral Banners
Showing posts with label Fortune 500. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fortune 500. Show all posts

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Be a Procurement Hero in a Time of Great Budgetary Needs: Maximizing Purchasing Power Amongst Colleges and Universities Through Reverse Auctions

Music Hall on a crisp Fall day at the Universi...Image via Wikipedia


Today, budget challenges are at the forefront of concern for all in higher education. Here’s a roadmap for a procurement revolution for colleges and universities. Through the use of reverse auctions, higher education executives can make sure their institution’s procurement operation is able to get the most “bang for the buck” and maximize the value of every purchase by benchmarking best practices in the private and public sector.


There’s been much talk of late – on sports radio, the four-letter network, and on sports pages and blogs – about major colleges and universities coming together to form major “super-conferences” for sports – namely the 800 pound gorilla that is major college football. When the dust settles, alliances and rivalries that have been in place for decades may well be put aside for yes, you guessed it, the almighty dollar.


Whether we see “football Armageddon” this year – or in a couple of years or even a decade from now, one thing is for certain. We have seen that yes, campus leaders are – at their core – businesspeople. They have to be! It is essential that they be excellent managers – and leaders – in order to have their institutions survive and thrive in an increasingly complex, highly competitive and rapidly changing world of higher education today – all while facing major budgetary pressures from a loss of both state funding and donor support, while in many cases seeing their endowments plunge in value as well. Yes, they are academic institutions, and yes, they are non-profit. However, no university president or college provost today – whether their home discipline is accounting, biology, or philosophy – has to be able to think and act like the leader of a major corporation – one that may have as many employees – and the revenue and expenses – of a Fortune 500 company!


With all the attention of late on the business of college sports, we have come to really appreciate that yes, the institution does have to balance its balance sheet and squeeze out at least to the break-even point on its income statement. If not, the future can be full of “unpleasantness” – spending freezes, employee furloughs and layoffs, discontinued programs – bad stuff! So, if a college can lower its procurement costs, this can free-up dollars to retain faculty, to preserve services, and to ensure that the quality of the institution is upheld – even in the face of dire economic circumstances.


Recently, we have seen an increasing number of colleges and universities around the country – mirroring the best practices of major companies, state governments, and even the federal sector – to increasingly make use of reverse auctions in their procurement. What is a reverse auction? Think of it as eBay – but in reverse! A reverse auction is a process in which a buyer solicits bids from interested sellers, and those sellers have the opportunity to submit a single bid, or multiple bids that decrease in price. So while we typically think of bidders bidding up the price to be paid in a forward auction to buy something, this works literally in reverse – as bidders are bidding down the price at which they will sell an item to a buying organization. While a reverse auction can be held in a physical event, most reverse auctions take place through a web or system-based electronic interface – an electronic marketplace.


Over the past decade, the evidence is quite clear – reverse auctions can produce savings on everything you buy – from paper clips and computers to yes, bulk purchases of utility power. They have become a proven tool for Fortune 500 companies and large governmental buyers, and now, with the advent of web-based, user-friendly interfaces, in many cases, an online e-marketplace can be the easiest – and fastest – way to reach new potential suppliers and ensure that you are maximizing the effectiveness of its procurement dollars for organizations of all sizes around the country and around the world. By partnering with a reverse auction provider, organizations can actually achieve substantial procurement savings – not just in dollar cost outlays, but in critical metrics such as time and manpower – all with a process that is likely to be more transparent and less subject to bid protests and other legal issues than standard operational methods.


And, for public sector agencies, there are a number of private sector partners to choose from, such as Co-exprise (http://www.co-exprise.com/), FedBid (http://www.fedbid.com/), and Procurex (http://www.procurexinc.com/), each of whom are experienced in partnering with governmental agencies to produce 10-20% savings – perhaps more – and in some cases, much more – on your acquisition dollars.


While reverse auction activity is rapidly growing in the federal government and at the state and local level as well, it is just now beginning to take-off with institutions of higher learning. Recently, Procurex helped a Midwestern university save $675,000 on a major purchase of coal, producing these savings in an extremely competitive electronic auction process that drove the institution’s price point down by having 7 potential suppliers issue 73 bids in just a 45-minute long event! There have also been individual institutions, such as Emory University in Atlanta, that have integrated reverse auctions into their purchasing processes to the point where electronic auctions have become a “first-choice” for procuring all manner of goods and services. Indeed, we have now even seen systems of institutions, such as the military academies and the University of Tennessee system’s work with FedBid, Inc., a Vienna, Virginia-based leader in the providing reverse auction services to governments at all levels. And FedBid’s model is to work with institutions on buys as small as $3,000, meaning that most of a college or universities purchasing could – and perhaps should – be competed via its electronic marketplace. And not just to make sure that an institution is getting the absolute lowest market price for the myriad goods, commodities and services necessary for any major customer-focused organization to operate today.


Finally, with all the attention on the University of Nebraska – and perhaps Notre Dame – joining the Big 10 Conference for football (and oh yes, the other sports as well), the Big 10 has led the way as a model for aggregating purchasing not just across individual campuses and entire systems, but between them as well. For over half a century, member institutions of the Big 10 – plus the University of Chicago – (see Table 1) have cooperated on all manner of cross-institutional research projects and student support initiatives through the Committee on Institutional Cooperation (CIC) (http://www.cic.net/).

Table 1 – CIC Member Universities
University of Chicago
University of Illinois
Indiana University
University of Iowa
University of Michigan
Michigan State University
University of Minnesota
Northwestern University
Ohio State University
Pennsylvania State University
Purdue University
University of Wisconsin-Madison

CIC member instituions have also cooperated to pool their purchasing power and save precious budgetary dollars through conduct joint reverse auction-based procurements. All told, the CIC Purchasing Consortium has produced aggregate savings in excess of eight million dollars, across a wide variety of items, including:
· IT equipment
· office suppliers
· furniture
· copy paper
· audio-visual equipment
· energy.
Based on results like these, The CIC recently announced that it was extending its contract with Procurex through 2013.


ANALYSIS

It is quite clear that higher education budgets will be under intense strain for the next coming years, with many predicting no end in sight for the state budget crises that have taken a huge toll on public colleges and universities. Private institutions have fared even worse in many cases, with falling endowments and a declining pool of applicants – with the ability to pay – or even to get financial aid.

So, for all the attention the “super-conference” debate has brought to the revenue side of the equation for college and university administrations across the land for the biggest, brand name, flagship-level universities, the real issue for all higher education executives is how to cut costs at their institution – even if it is one that doesn’t make SportCenter on a regular basis – if ever. For the procurement departments at hundreds of very good, but non-football power schools, this is a time of counting paper clips and making sure that every dollar and every penny of funding gets the most “bang for the buck.” So now is most certainly the time for all in charge of higher ed purchasing to take a first – or another look – at how you can best employ reverse auctions to become a “Procurement Hero” in this era of big budget crises! And for college presidents, university chancellors, and members of governing boards, why not ask the “why aren’t we doing this” question to get your staff moving on this – yesterday!

Here at the Reverse Auction Research Center (http://reverseauctionresearch.blogspot.com/), we’re particularly focused on how all colleges and universities can best make use of reverse auctions in institutional procurement operations and maximize the value of each and every purchasing dollar. If you’re interested in learning more – or if you have a story to share about your own experiences using reverse auctions in a higher ed environment, please contact me at dwyld.kwu@gmail.com.

About the Author:
David C. Wyld (dwyld.kwu@gmail.com) is the Director of the Reverse Auction Research Center (http://reverseauctionresearch.blogspot.com/). He currently serves as the Robert Maurin Professor of Management at Southeastern Louisiana University in Hammond, Louisiana. He is a noted expert on reverse auctions and e-procurement topics, being widely published on the topic and a recognized expert/consultant in the area. He has been named among the Rising Stars in Federal Information Technology by Federal Computer Week.


Read more: http://bizcovering.com/business/be-a-procurement-hero-in-a-time-of-great-budgetary-needs-maximizing-purchasing-power-amongst-colleges-and-universities-through-reverse-auctions/#ixzz0r9chmTmC


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


++++++++++++++++++++++
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, June 11, 2010

Pittsburgh Blazes The Way, Again, in Reverse Auctions: How Municipal Governments are Saving Millions of Taxpayer Dollars on Their Energy Purchases Through Introducing Reverse Auction-based Competition Among Power Suppliers | Socyberty

The Allegheny County CourthouseImage via Wikipedia


by David C. Wyld Southeastern Louisiana University - June 11, 2010

In a Nutshell:
The pioneering reverse auction firm, FreeMarkets, rose a decade ago from Pittsburgh. Now, the City of Pittsburgh is leading an effort to combine agencies’ purchasing power to produce powerful savings on electrical and natural gas procurements through reverse auctions.




The Pittsburgh-area has been a hotbed of reverse auction activity over the years. A decade ago, FreeMarkets grew fast to become the market leader in bringing reverse auctions into prominence in business-to-business and business-to-government procurements. Today, we are seeing the results of an exciting partnership between governments across the Pittsburgh region – working with a private-sector reverse auction provider, Co-exprise (http://www.co-exprise.com/), based in nearby Wexford, Pennsylvania.


The Western Pennsylvania Energy Aggregation Program has already produced multi-million dollar savings for taxpayers through the use of reverse auctions for utility procurements for governmental agencies in the area – with promises for much more in the future. This innovative effort, initiated in 2007, first began with an effort to aggregate electricity purchases for governments in the Pittsburgh area in the wake of deregulation in Pennsylvania’s electricity market statewide. With the structure of the partnership, there was very little risk for the governments involved, as the fees for the program are borne not by the public agencies, but rather they are paid for by the successful suppliers. In 2008, the initial bulk-purchase of electricity capacity – conducted using an electronic reverse auction where competitors anonymously bid down the price at which they would supply the kilowatt hours needed by the various agencies – produced a savings of $1.4 million dollars over the expected price level, based on current market conditions and historical buys. Co-exprise Chief Executive Officer Bill Blair commented that the result of the initial energy auction “was a powerful display of strategic sourcing processes coupled with next generation technology deployed to assist public and private entities in achieving best market price for their electricity contracts.”


Just last month (May 2010), the second procurement auction for aggregated governmental electrical needs was conducted. This event produced – for a combined 30 million kilowatt hours of electricity – shaved more than a full penny (6.54 cents per kilowatt hour versus 7.75 cents) that the winning bidder, Duquesne Light Energy, normally charged its municipal customers. For the City of Pittsburgh alone, this means the municipal government saved residents over $1 million dollars over the next three years through this single acquisition! And for even the smallest of participating governmental agencies, the savings can be of critical importance. Take for instance the Borough of Wilkinsburg, PA. It will save $7,600 a year under the reverse auction negotiated energy contract. As Borough Manager Marla Marcinko recently commented, while not Pittsburgh-level savings, for her community, these thousands of dollars a year are critical, as she observed: “I wish we could do this every day. Every little bit helps.” And dollar savings are not the only benefits to be gained by the participating communities and their residents. As part of this agreement for cooperative electrical procurement, the cooperating agencies specified that they would buy – and suppliers who bid would agree to provide – at least ten percent of the total kilowatt hours from renewable energy sources. This has brought-on the support of the Pittsburgh Climate Initiative (http://www.pittsburghclimate.org/) for this cross-agency, public-private cooperative effort that produces both cheaper and cleaner energy use by governmental agencies across much of Western Pennsylvania.

Now, based on the success of the bulk electric power acquisitions, the Western Pennsylvania Energy Aggregation Program recently announced that it would work with Co-exprise again to procure natural gas for a number of Pittsburgh-area governmental agencies, including:
· City of Pittsburgh
· Allegheny County
· Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium
· Pittsburgh Water & Sewer Authority
· Pittsburgh Public Schools
· Allegheny County Airport Authority.
According to Co-exprise’s Blair, in the natural gas program to be carried out this fall (preceding the need for wintertime peak utilization): “Co-exprise will reach out to multiple natural gas suppliers…, and only the most competitive and qualified suppliers will participate on bid day. The result will be best market price and terms for the county, city, school district and airport authority, and most importantly, their constituents.” Thus, this cooperation between governmental agencies and their innovative private sector partner in Co-exprise serves to produce an unquestionable “win-win” for the taxpayers of the area. Indeed, Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl recently commented on the success of the reverse auction energy acquisition program, stating: “The Western Pennsylvania Energy Aggregation Program is a great example of best-in-class purchasing practices that are enabled by 21st Century technology. The joint efforts are helping us to make the best use of taxpayer dollars.”

Here at the Reverse Auction Research Center (http://reverseauctionresearch.blogspot.com/), we’ll keep tabs on the progress of this Pittsburgh area initiative, and expect a follow-up post this fall after the reverse auction is conducted. I would expect that we’ll again see the Western Pennsylvania Energy Aggregation Program and Co-exprise once again produce seven-figure savings for the participating agencies in the region, generating real savings for taxpayers and positive press for government executives in the participating agencies.

Analysis

What lesson is there in the Pittsburgh-area success story? Well, it is simple really. If you are a governmental executive, with public sector budgets universally facing shortfalls and budgets bleeding red ink, now is the not the time to worry about if a great idea is born in your own head – or comes from your staff. Do not worry about the “NIH” syndrome (Not Invented Here). Rather, just as the best private sector organizations do, benchmark best practices and do what is proven to work. Follow these Pittsburgh-area agencies’ innovative actions and ask yourself (and your underlings) why you are not pursuing similar programs in your own procurement.

Over the past decade, the evidence is quite clear – reverse auctions can produce savings on everything you buy – from paper clips and computers to yes, bulk purchases of utility power. They have become a proven tool for Fortune 500 companies and large governmental buyers, and now, with the advent of web-based, user-friendly interfaces, in many cases, an online e-marketplace can be the easiest – and fastest – way to reach new potential suppliers and ensure that you are maximizing the effectiveness of its procurement dollars for organizations of all sizes around the country and around the world. And, for public sector agencies, there are a number of private sector partners to choose from, such as Co-exprise (http://www.co-exprise.com/), FedBid (http://www.fedbid.com/), and Procurex (http://www.procurexinc.com/) which are experienced in partnering with governmental agencies to produce 10-20% savings – perhaps more – and in some cases, much more – on your acquisition dollars.

If you haven’t looked into reverse auctions, there is indeed no time better than right now to do so. While it’s on your computer screen and fresh in your mind, circulate this Pittsburgh case study to your key people and get moving towards saving big money – and becoming a champion of spending taxpayer dollars more wisely – today! At the Reverse Auction Research Center (http://reverseauctionresearch.blogspot.com/), we’re here to help your agency learn how you to can use proven “best in class” procurement methods to streamline your acquisition process and save all-important taxpayer dollars to make you a hero to your constituents.

Sources

Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Government. Press Release: Onorato, Ravenstahl Announce Savings from Initial Joint Energy Purchase, February 7, 2008. Available at http://www.alleghenycounty.us/news/2008/280207a.asp.

Brandolph, Adam. “Energy auction cuts $1 million off electric bills,” The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, May 27, 2010. Available at http://dailyme.com/story/2010052700001178/energy-auction-cuts-1-million-electric.html.

“Co-exprise Partners with City of Pittsburgh to Power Natural Gas Aggregation Initiative – Cooperative Purchase and Reverse Auction Provide Relief for Region’s Taxpayers,” Computersor, May 2010. Available at http://Computersor.com/space/lion77248c381o/uso9108549006.

Levine, Marty. “PA Companies Tap into Electricity Deregulation,” Keystone Edge, December 12, 2008. Available at http://www.keystoneedge.com/features/electricitydereg1218.aspx.

About the Author

David C. Wyld (dwyld.kwu@gmail.com) is the Director of the Reverse Auction Research Center (http://reverseauctionresearch.blogspot.com/). He currently serves as the Robert Maurin Professor of Management at Southeastern Louisiana University in Hammond, Louisiana. He is a noted expert on reverse auctions and e-procurement topics, being widely published on the topic and a recognized expert/consultant in the area. He has been named among the Rising Stars in Federal Information Technology by Federal Computer Week.


Read more at Pittsburgh Blazes The Way, Again, in Reverse Auctions: How Municipal Governments are Saving Millions of Taxpayer Dollars on Their Energy Purchases Through Introducing Reverse Auction-based Competition Among Power Suppliers | Socyberty
++++++++++++++++++++++
Enhanced by Zemanta