RefBan

Referral Banners

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

I’m Mentally Ill, I Love Violent Video Games, And They’ve Never Made Me Feel Like Killing Anyone

January 16th, 2013Top Story

I'm Mentally Ill, I Love Violent Video Games, And They've Never Made Me Feel Like Killing Anyone

By Dennis Scimeca

I’m Mentally Ill, I Love Violent Video Games, And They’ve Never Made Me Feel Like Killing AnyoneWhen it was reported that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, the perpetrators of the Columbine High School massacre were big fans of Doom, the original first person shooter in the eyes of many, I dismissed the idea that violent video games could have been responsible for inspiring the event. As a lifelong devotee of video games, I thought that idea was ridiculous.

That was back in 1999 when I was in my early 20s. It was also the year when I was diagnosed with bipolar disorder. It's impossible to pinpoint precisely when the illness began, but mood disorders often kick in with the onset of puberty. My parents sent me to my first therapist when I was 15 years old, so that sounds about right. It also means that I'd coincidentally been suffering from bipolar disorder for about 15 years before I sought treatment.

It has been reported that Adam Lanza—the 20-year-old who shot and killed 20 schoolchildren and six adults at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut—was a big fan of Call of Duty. Blame the games? What of mental illness? I think someone would have to be mentally ill in order to think a first grade classroom of six- and seven-year olds deserved what Lanza did to them.

People speculate that violent games and mental illness mix badly. They theorize that the former exacerbates the latter.

I can't listen to conversations about mental illness and violent video games—all the speculation that those games could inspire the mentally ill to commit these atrocities—and not think that these people are also talking about me.

I hear those conversations at work or in mixed company. Sometimes I hear them from the mouths of family members when they visit and see me playing Halo 4 or Battlefield 3.

I quietly listen to the speculation and the concern and don't say a word, even though I want to say, "I'm mentally ill, I've gorged on violent video games my entire life, and they've never made me feel like doing harm to another human being.

***

Bipolar disorder is characterized in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—the text by which psychiatrists identify specific mental illnesses in patients—as a mood disorder. The DSM uses codes to label the various diagnoses. There are 63 codes for mood disorders alone. I'm not even sure which precise code would be used to diagnose me at this point, but I speak for myself here, not as some token representative of the mentally-ill community.

I remember more than I want to what it feels like to become unglued and let my moods run wild.

I have also been in treatment for thirteen years. Thanks to the blessings of available health care, a supportive family, and the luck of finding the right doctors and therapists I'm no longer subject to the whims of my mood swings. I no longer get so angry that I can't even use words to express it and have to fight back the urge to just destroy things in my house, and the real problem isn't being angry at all but in tremendous amounts of emotional pain. I don't become so depressed that I just want to sit in a room and not move or talk or even breathe.

I've been through four years of psychoanalysis, and a full battery of psychological testing to gauge my attention, memory, decision-making capacity and other, more quantifiable brain functions to rule out potential organic causes of my disorder, and am currently on medications and in traditional therapy. I still haven't done all the work I will probably have to in order to exercise the full measure of control over my illness, but now I can handle pressure and deal with emotional pain and live a life that's as stable as most.

I'm not speaking as someone who is actively in the throes of mental illness, but I remember more than I want to what it feels like to become unglued and let my moods run wild.

This happened once as a result of playing video games. I experienced severe manic episodes and there was no doubt the game I'd been playing was responsible. It had nothing to do with first person shooters, the specific genre of video game that everyone worries about in the wake of a school shooting.

***

Shooter games have never had much effect on me.

When I was five years old, the nearest things I had to violent video games were cartridges like Combat or Canyon Bomber on the Atari 2600. In 1987, when I was 13 years old, I got heavily into Operation Wolf. The player held a fake Uzi on a swivel and shot bad guys while the screen slowly panned to the right until the end of each level. That sort of arcade cabinet with fake guns was as close as I came to first person shooters until the first time I saw Doom. I was 19 years old and a junior in college.

I’m Mentally Ill, I Love Violent Video Games, And They’ve Never Made Me Feel Like Killing Anyone

I played Dark Forces—the original Star Wars-themed first person shooter—in 1995 when I was 20. I don't remember getting into another FPS game until Medal of Honor: Frontline for the PlayStation 2 in 2002 when I was 27. These were just more video games to me, albeit with much better graphics and a different kind of skill challenge. I don't think they had any specific influence on my psyche that was different from any other kind of video game I grew up playing. I understood them all to be electronic entertainment and not simulations of reality, and I'd like to hope the same holds true for kids nowadays who grow up playing age-appropriate games and then graduate to shooters.

What I would mostly come to feel when I played FPS games was camaraderie.

What I would mostly come to feel when I played FPS games was camaraderie, because, as years passed, I mostly played them online with my friends. They now feel like what playing hide-and-seek or tag felt like when I was little. My favorite game of last year was a first-person shooter—Borderlands 2—because I could jump into an Xbox Live party chat with my friends and talk about our day while we shot things. The aiming and jumping and reloading sometimes felt autonomic and the least important part of the experience.

I’m Mentally Ill, I Love Violent Video Games, And They’ve Never Made Me Feel Like Killing Anyone

Even when I used to play Medal of Honor: Allied Assault online and was still in the beginning stages of my treatment—and when I was awful at competitive online first person shooter games—I don't remember flying off in a rage after losing a match. I've never exchanged homophobic barbs with complete strangers after a game of Call of Duty or indulged in the rape culture vileness that so many online FPS players sound like they revel in. Sometimes in the light of behavior like this I wonder if I'm the most stable person in an open Xbox Live game chat while playing a first person shooter online.

When I play single player campaigns in first person shooters I feel the same sort of satisfaction I get from solving puzzles along with the adrenaline rush of being successful in a high-pressure situation. Halo 4 was all about surveying levels, assessing the tools I had available, picking the right guns for the job, and enjoying the kinesthetics of running and jumping and aiming and shooting. I play first person shooters because I love the skill challenge. I was rubbish at playing sports as a kid, but I'm a pretty good FPS player and I feel a healthy sense of satisfaction when I beat a Halo 4 level at the Legendary (highest) difficulty level.

***

There are games that have exacerbated my bipolar disorder or drew upon unhealthy aspects of my psychology. They weren't first person shooters.

Role playing games have been the chief culprits, specifically Star Wars Galaxies and Fallout 3, because they allowed me to feel like I was playing the lives of these characters. These games are more of a script. I'm the star actor, and acting is about drawing upon your own experience and emotions to portray someone else.

I’m Mentally Ill, I Love Violent Video Games, And They’ve Never Made Me Feel Like Killing Anyone

The manic highs I suffered from my illness usually manifested themselves as delusions of grandeur. I was embarrassed and ashamed of my mood swings and spent a lot of time hating myself growing up. The flip side of this was covering for the self-hate with an inflated ego and narcissistic tendencies.

When I founded a Player Association in Star Wars Galaxies it was with the intention of making a PA whose members were solely humans in full Stormtrooper armor and thus roleplaying the official presence of the Empire in a game where every other PA ran around in haphazard combinations of races and classes and gear. I roleplayed an Imperial officer, and we were going to be better than all the other PAs, more authentic. And it was all about my ego. Predictably, it fell apart. I was so devastated when it did that I woke up my wife from a dead sleep in the wee hours of the morning and flew into a tear-filled rage.

The only time I've ever felt like a video game truly tapped into something dark and disturbing in my psyche was when I played Fallout 3.

The only time I've ever felt like a video game truly tapped into something dark and disturbing in my psyche was when I played Fallout 3 as a character I named Vault Boy. He was a psychopathic, cruel killer who, to the tune of my boisterous laughter, would slaughter entire towns. I like to imagine that it's only the preposterousness of the violence in Fallout 3 which made Vault Boy's antics so amusing—and dark humor is part of the Fallout series's enduring legacy—but that wasn't the only reason I found myself laughing. I think indulging in Vault Boy's behavior brought a sense of relief.

I spent years choking down my irrational anger at the entire world, trying to keep it together and treat people with respect. When I allowed myself to drop that polite façade and tried to connect with people, the anger and frustration would seep out, poorly disguised as sardonic humor. I'd say, for example, that I wished that people who I didn't like were forced to relocate to the moon. I'd then laugh at the idea. Some people found my antics amusing. Other people looked at me like I was a live grenade with a loose pin. There were times I wished I could have thrown politeness and civility out the window and told everyone precisely what I thought about them, with all the venom and fury that went along with my manic highs whenever I would get frustrated with people.

Fallout 3 gave me the opportunity to play a character who shucked all that self-control away and did whatever the hell he wanted with no concern for what anyone would think.

I’m Mentally Ill, I Love Violent Video Games, And They’ve Never Made Me Feel Like Killing Anyone

I've never taken the ultra-violent, gore-ridden images from Vault Boy's exploits and used them as fodder for fantasies about the real world, because it's not about that. Vault Boy is a conduit into very old anger from before my illness was treated, and by indulging in his exploits I tap into and vomit up all the accumulated bile. It feels similar to my very early therapy sessions where I was sometimes offered a pillow to punch when I was ranting angrily.

I also have a character named Vault Girl who is a paragon of virtue, and her world is so much better than Vault Boy's. She has friends to talk to and merchants to purchase goods from, because she hasn't killed them all. She gets to listen to Galaxy News Radio wherever she is on the map because she helped Three Dog the DJ to boost the station's signal. Vault Boy gets nothing but static most everywhere he goes, because when Three Dog refused to give Vault Boy something he wanted, Vault Boy killed him. The stories of Vault Boy and Vault Girl serve as a lesson for me about why never giving in to my anger in the real world was the right choice. My life would be so much worse if I had.

***

Don't get me wrong about this next bit.

If I'd had access to firearms in high school before being diagnosed and treated for my bipolar disorder, as upsetting as it feels, to be honest, I might have been a candidate to become a school shooter. Lord knows that, as a high school nerd being bullied by the jocks and the popular kids on a regular basis, I harbored elaborate revenge fantasies against my tormentors. Thankfully, there was only one time I ever contemplated violence that I might have been able to carry out, and it was some time after that.

As upsetting as it feels, to be honest, I might have been a candidate to become a school shooter.

I moved back to rural Upstate New York in between my undergraduate and graduate degrees. One night I was invited to a party being thrown in a trailer on the property of some people I'd met through an old high school friend. It was a mock invitation. They had decided that I was too stuck up for my own good and had someone waiting on the roof of the trailer with a bucket full of cheap beer that they'd also pissed in. (I got the story later from one of the people who'd been in the trailer and hadn't liked what everyone else was doing but didn't speak up.)

I was lucky that I heard the rumbling on the roof just as I stepped up to the trailer doorway and dodged out of the way, catching only a few, small splashes. And when I went home that night I fantasized about sneaking back there with a can of gasoline and some homemade Molotov cocktails and setting the trailer on fire. I had everything I needed in my parents' garage to have done so if I'd really wanted to. And for the record, the video games I was playing at the time were almost exclusively 3D space combat simulators, not first person shooters.

I didn't take my thoughts of revenge past the realm of fantasy for the same reason that even if I had been able to get my hands on guns in high school I doubt I'd have used them. I had a family who loved me, and friends who listened to my suicidal rants and slides into depression. These people comforted me.

***

When I was a kid, I had Nintendo Entertainment System cartridges to trade with buddies and huge video game arcades to go to with my friends. They gave me the lion's share of what joy I had growing up. I took my Super Nintendo Entertainment System to college and played NHL all night with roommates, and played Marathon on my best friend's Macintosh. Video games were responsible for my moments of joy I held onto for all the years I bounced between debilitating manic highs and paralyzing, depressive lows and showering my friends and family with the emotional shrapnel of my mood swings.

I’m Mentally Ill, I Love Violent Video Games, And They’ve Never Made Me Feel Like Killing Anyone

Those moments of joy, so many of which I felt as a result of playing video games, were the things I held onto when I thought about killing myself on almost a daily basis, because as long as I kept having those moments I couldn't honestly say life was so bad that it was time to give up.

***

If we want to look at why Adam Lanza walked into an elementary school and opened fire on a bunch of children and adults, it's not video games we need to be looking at. We need to ask who was paying attention to him, and had anyone noticed something was wrong with him emotionally would the mental health care he probably needed have been both accessible and affordable?

We need to ask whether there are common sense rules about firearm ownership that ought to be more strictly mandated by law. Why were the ammunition magazines of the Bushmaster assault rifle Lanza used out in the open versus being locked away in a safe? Why didn't all of those weapons have trigger-guards on them?

It's not video games we need to be looking at.

Discussion of violent video games is currently providing the same distraction it always does in the face of school shootings like what took place at Columbine and Sandy Hook. As someone who suffered severely from mental illness, and who is old enough to have played violent video games since the very beginning, I can't imagine those games having ever been enough to drive me to commit the tragic acts of violence that school shooters like Harris and Klebold and Lanza perpetrated.

What might have made me a school shooter in some other reality would have been whether I was lonely, or whether anyone was paying any attention to the fact that I was in constant pain, or whether I could have easily laid my hands on a lot of guns, and I'm very glad that in my case none of those things were true.

Dennis Scimeca is a freelance writer from Boston, MA. He blogs at punchingsnakes.com and would love to talk about video games with you on Twitter: @DennisScimeca.

Number of comments

Arson, Cracked Testicles, and Internet Death Threats: How Animal Rights Extremists Are Learning From the People Who Murdered George Tiller

January 16th, 2013Top Story

Arson, Cracked Testicles, and Internet Death Threats: How Animal Rights Extremists Are Learning From the People Who Murdered George Tiller

By Jordan Heller

Arson, Cracked Testicles, and Internet Death Threats: How Animal Rights Extremists Are Learning From the People Who Murdered George Tiller"We will...strap you into a monkey restraining device and use industrial pliers to crack your testicles like walnuts." That was the simple message that medical researcher Dr. Donal O'Leary received in October 2011.

The note, which threatened to kidnap O'Leary and went on to reference myriad tortures including dismemberment, disembowelment, Drano and napalm, was published on Negotiation Is Over (NIO), a website that acts as a one-stop shop for animal rights extremists looking to gather intelligence on potential targets. In addition to labeling O'Leary—a professor at Detroit's Wayne State University whose studies on congestive heart failure involve experiments on rodents and occasionally dogs—a sadistic animal torturer, it published his photo and home address.

In an email to O'Leary alerting him of the post, Camille Marino, who until last month ran NIO out of her home in Hollywood, Fla., told the professor that some of her "associates" would be paying him a visit to take pictures of his home.

"Then you can join 'NIO's most wanted,'" she wrote. "I hope you die a slow and painful death."

Arson, Cracked Testicles, and Internet Death Threats: How Animal Rights Extremists Are Learning From the People Who Murdered George TillerAnimal right activist Camille Marino, who has done stints as an investment banker and law student, was convicted last year of repeatedly threatening a medical researcher.

In December, a Michigan judge sentenced Marino, 48, to six months in prison and three years probation for charges related to her off- and online stalking of O'Leary, who at trial called Marino a "clearly disturbed individual, who was threatening me personally, threatening my children, threatening my home."

While Marino has never herself committed any acts of violence or property damage, O'Leary and the judge feared that her words could incite unstable individuals to violence. After all, NIO doesn't just post wistful death fantasies about those who don't abide by their vegan ideals. In addition to posting the names and addresses of medical researchers who experiment on animals, NIO offers instructions on deactivating home security systems, lock-picking, and bomb-making, along with rhetoric that rationalizes the murder of its intended targets as nothing short of justifiable homicide.

Though Marino and her ilk are leftists—she has called herself a pro-choice feminist—these methods are drawn straight from the The Nuremberg Files, the far-right Christian website famous for publishing the home addresses of abortion doctors, along with "Wanted" posters showing their faces. One of the Nuremberg Files' targets was George Tiller, who was gunned down in cold blood four years ago by an anti-abortion extremist while he prayed in his local church in Wichita, Kan.

Dr. J. David Jentsch, a UCLA neuroscientist whose studies on addiction involve experiments on mice, rats and vervet monkeys, is all too familiar with the parallel. Around the same time that Tiller was murdered, Marino had made Jentsch a target on NIO and nicknamed him after the slain abortion doctor. Animal rights activists quickly showed up in front of his Los Angeles home, accusing him of torture and murder, and chanting, "David 'Tiller' Jentsch."

"I think people like Marino have been unambiguous about the fact that murder is where this movement is going," said Jentsch, whose experiences with Marino and others in the animal liberation movement go well beyond just being called names.

Shortly before Marino started targeting him in 2009, Jentsch told me, he was roused out of bed at 4 in the morning by an explosion in his driveway. Jentsch found his car engulfed in flames, which threatened to spread to his house via a nearby tree. When the windows and tires of his car exploded, he ran back inside to safety.

While a group called the Animal Liberation Brigade took credit for the fire bombing—no arrests have been made—it was Marino who kept others in the movement updated on Jentsch's whereabouts.

In July of 2010, shortly after Jentsch moved due to growing concern about his safety, Marino posted an open letter to him on her website listing his new address.

"Everyone at NIO is most anxious to throw you a housewarming," she wrote. "A very very hot housewarming."

Demonstrators quickly appeared in front of Jentsch's new home. A short time later, when he opened up a letter that arrived in the mail, razor blades spilled onto the floor. "We follow you wherever you go," Jenstch recalled the accompanying note reading. "One day, we're gonna come up behind you and slit your throat."

Marino, for her part, openly published material saying Jentsch should have his blood "spilled," along with an image of the professor's security gate with directions on how to deactivate it. To this day, Jentsch is accompanied 24-7 by armed security guards.

Jentsch found his car engulfed in flames, which threatened to spread to his house via a nearby tree. When the windows and tires of his car exploded, he ran back inside to safety.

Having studied law at Fordham and worked in the investment banking business, Marino is not a life-long extremist. In interviews before her sentencing, she told me she initially got into animal rights activism five years ago, after looking into vegetarianism for the purpose of losing weight. After coming across some articles about the horrors of factory farming, she immediately became a vegan and was shortly thereafter radicalized in her thinking.

Over the phone, Marino came off as the happy warrior, interspersing her convictions on animal rights with easy laughs about her then-impending incarceration, which had the potential to total ten years in prison.
"The joke among the prosecutors is that 'negotiation is over,'" she told me, laughing at her adversaries' use of her credo against her.

Couple Marino's affable demeanor with the photographs online of her wearing Day-Glo-colored clothing and bleach-blond hair, and it's difficult to imagine this as the same person who encouraged readers to show up at O'Leary's home and take pictures of his "miscreant spawn" for publication on NIO.

Though Marino's objective is to frighten her targets into giving up researching on animals, when confronted with the very real prospect of her actions inciting violence, she denies any culpability.
"It's not publishing info that generates a reaction," she said. "The action is generated by what people do; If he was a baker, he would have nothing to worry about. I don't encourage or discourage anyone from any action that they feel is just."

As far as Marino is concerned, the notion that animal research has ever or ever will lead to health benefits for humans is a colossal lie. Through the use of laboratory animals, UCLA alone has had myriad medical breakthroughs for everything from cancer, heart disease, Alzheimer's and schizophrenia. If it weren't for animal research, we'd arguably still be without a vaccine for Tuberculosis, which was responsible for nearly 25 percent of all deaths in 19th century Europe.

But she sees no difference between the animal researcher trying to make a better shampoo and the one who is trying to cure cancer.

"They're not intending to cure cancer," Marino told me, incredulous that I'd even ask her to make a distinction. "Cancer research is a front for getting more money for their sadistic experiments. They're driven by getting tax payer money. Because you can't extrapolate results from one species to another."

It's this conspiracy theory that, in the mind of the animal rights extremist, allows for a Manichean perspective that places the animal researcher squarely in the category of heartless villain.

Perhaps just as troubling is that such rhetoric drowns out the more moderate voices advocating for technological advances that might some day make animal research obsolete. In the last decade, there have been major advancements in computer modeling of biological processes and the ability to grow cell and tissue cultures outside of living organisms, which have already spared an untold number of lab animals. Even a mainstream institution like Johns Hopkins boasts a Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing.

The charge that ultimately earned Marino her sentence—the unlawful posting of a message with aggravated circumstances—stemmed from the aforementioned NIO article about torturing O'Leary. Under Michigan law, an "unlawful post" is a message sent through an electronic medium without the victim's consent, which is intended to make the victim feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested.

Arson, Cracked Testicles, and Internet Death Threats: How Animal Rights Extremists Are Learning From the People Who Murdered George TillerWalter Bond, NIO's "Director of Militant Direct Action," is serving a federal sentence for torching a restaurant that served foie gras. He's written that the world would be better off if "non-Vegans were disposed of."

But Marino didn't stop there. The following day, she emailed O'Leary again with a link to another article on her website. It again included O'Leary's picture and home address, along with a video of the animal rights activist and University of Texas-El Paso philosophy professor, Steven Best, calling on others to break the law in service of the animal liberation movement. "Every motherfucker who hurts animals is gonna feel the fear," Best says in the video.

O'Leary got a restraining order against Marino—as Jentsch had before him—and when she persisted in referring to him on her website and showed up on Wayne State University's campus with a placard bearing O'Leary's picture and home address, Marino was arrested.

While it is easy to dismiss Marino as a harmless kook, Jentsch and others in the research community warn that her actions will eventually incite others to violence.

"It's how the anti-abortion community works," said Jentsch. "They are committed through their own statements to increasing the probability that an unstable person will do something like what happened to George Tiller.... They're doing everything within legal bounds to encourage this type of behavior."

In addition to celebrating violence against researchers on her website, Marino has forged a working relationship with Walter Bond, who's listed on NIO as the group's "Director of Militant Direct Action." Bond, who has the word "vegan" tattooed across his neck, is currently serving 87 months in a federal prison on arson charges for burning to the ground a leather factory and a restaurant that served foie gras in Utah. Last year, Bond published a post on NIO saying that the world would be a better place for animals if "non-Vegans were disposed of" because it's "difficult to harm an Animal if you're dead."

But despite her associations and regular threats of harm against researchers, Marino refuses to see herself as complicit in any violence that may be committed by her readers.

It's not how the U.S. District Court in Oregon ruled more than 13 years ago, when the anti-abortion extremists behind The Nuremberg Files were found guilty of unlawful intimidation, and ordered to pay $109 million to Planned Parenthood and a group of abortion doctors who feared for their lives because of their inclusion on the website. At the time of the verdict, three doctors on the Nuremberg list had already been slain, with each of their names appearing on the website with a line drawn through.

But only two years later, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the verdict. As Judge Alex Kozinski wrote in the decision, if the defendants "merely encouraged unrelated terrorists, then their words are protected by the First Amendment." In order for the verdict to hold, the judge said, the defendants themselves have to had "threatened to commit violent acts." (The jury award was ultimately reinstated by the full appeals court, which held that the "Wanted" posters were "not political hyperbole.... They were a true threat.")

It's the same defense that Marino has used to avoid more serious charges, but nevertheless, the federal government continues to move against animal rights extremism.

Arson, Cracked Testicles, and Internet Death Threats: How Animal Rights Extremists Are Learning From the People Who Murdered George TillerA screengrab from Negotiation Is Over showing medical researcher and "dog torture-murderer" Donal O'Leary's photograph, home address, and phone number.

In 2006, George W. Bush signed into law The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA), which gives the federal government broad powers in prosecuting those who seek to harm animal-related businesses or institutions. While on the surface, AETA is meant to facilitate prosecutions against the likes of the Animal Liberation Brigade and the Animal Liberation Front—violent groups the FBI has labeled domestic terrorist threats—opponents of the law say it can unfairly punish anyone found to have caused an animal-related business to lose money, and as such is an unconstitutional infringement on free speech.

"This statute is preventing animal rights activists from carrying out their peaceful activities," Matthew Segal, the legal director for the ACLU of Massachusetts, told me. "If you're a non-violent animal rights activist, and you trespass or protest on private property, under AETA you're treated as a violent terrorist."

The Center for Constitutional Rights currently has a complaint before the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts challenging the constitutionality of the law. In Blum v. Holder, the plaintiffs say AETA criminalizes such activities protected by the First Amendment as protests, boycotts, picketing and whistle-blowing. (One of the plaintiffs in that action, Lauren Gazzola, served more than three years in federal prison after being convicted of violating the AETA for her role in operating a web site that is strikingly similar to NIO.)

Even the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals—who while no doubt bombasitc have never been known to be violent—have recently come under increased government scrutiny: Last fall, WikiLeaks made public Stratfor emails hacked by Anonymous, which revealed that the FBI had launched a criminal investigation into PETA as recently as 2009.

The FBI wouldn't comment on any specific cases involving animal rights extremism, but in an email to me, FBI spokeswoman Kathleen Wright said there's been an uptick in violent threats by animal rights extremist groups since 2005, and confirmed that the Bureau continues to view "animal rights extremism as a significant threat."

While Marino has yet to be prosecuted by the feds and calls her sentence in Michigan a "slap on the wrist," Jentsch is confident that the authorities are not taking these groups lightly. And he sees the fact that Marino took a plea deal—which forbids her from any future contact with, or writings about, O'Leary or Wayne State—as a sign that her convictions may not run so deep.

"If she truly believes her own lies about the animal abuse happening at Wayne State," he asked, "why did she decide to walk away, placing her own freedom above the lives of the animals in the labs there?"

But in a statement posted to NIO after striking her plea deal with the Wayne County prosecutor, Marino remained defiant. "I think it's time that we all stop using words and let our actions speak far more eloquently for who we are and what we represent," she said.

As for her website, Marino continues to post to it (via letters to collaborators on the outside) from the Dickerson Detention Facility in Michigan and, as recently as January 1, showed no signs of giving up her cause.

"I am looking forward to the evolving threat that we represent taking shape in the New Year," she wrote.

Jordan Heller is a journalist based in New York City. Most recently, he served as a news editor at The Daily. He can be reached at jordhell@gmail.com.

[Image by Jim Cooke]

Number of comments

Cheat Sheet - 7 Key Points From Obama’s Gun Proposal

The Cheat Sheet

Today: NRA Vows ‘Fight of the Century’ , Texas Calls All Gun-Toting Yanks , Americans Seized in Algeria
Cheat Sheet: Afternoon

January 16, 2013
Explainer

President Obama just signed twenty-three executive orders, that sure is a lot. The Daily Beast’s Caitlin Dickson digs in to Obama’s gun–control proposal to see what he can do right away—and what he’ll have to beg Congress for.

REALLY?

Hey, NRA, the century is not even 13 years old, declaring a “fight of the century” might be a bit premature. The nation’s largest gun lobby vowed to use all their resources to fight President Obama in a fundraising letter distributed on Wednesday—the same day Obama announced a crackdown in gun laws. “I warned you this day was coming and now it is here,” NRA president Wayne LaPierre declares in the leaflet, which is being circulated at the 35th Annual Shooting, Hunting, Outdoor Trade Show in Las Vegas. On Wednesday, the NRA and other gun advocacy groups spend the whole day in closed-door meetings to draft a response to Obama’s proposal to reduce gun violence, which included a ban on assault weapons, higher-capacity magazine guns, and stricter background checks.

Fire at Will

Now that New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has signed sweeping gun-control laws, a strange new ad promises gun-loving New Yorkers their firearms will be safe in the Lonestar State. The Daily Beast’s David Freedlander reports.

HOSTAGES

Forty-one hostages—including an unspecified number of Americans—were seized by militants at a gas field in Algeria on Wednesday, the U.S. State Department confirmed. Specific details concering the Americans in custody have yet to be released, a move the State Department deems necessary to “protect their safety.” Described by the State Department as a terrorist attack, the incident allegedly took place at a gas operation in In Aménas, a joint-venture operation that includes BP. Citing two Mauritania-based news agencies, Reuters places the blame on Islamic militants, most likely retaliating against France for its intervention in Mali.

‘LITTLE EARTHQUAKE’

At least two people are dead and another 13 were injured in central London when a helicopter crashed into a crane near a bus station in a busy part of the city during the morning commute on Wednesday. The helicopter crashed into the crane near the Vauxhall Cross bus station at 8 a.m. local time, and then hit various vehicles before bursting into flames. One of the fatalities has been confirmed as the pilot, Pete Barnes, 50. “When I heard the explosion—it was like a little earthquake,” eyewitness Sarah-Beth Casey told The Telegraph. Sixty firefighters responded to the scene at Wandsworth Road, with the London Fire Brigade station manager Bruce Gain saying crews arrived to the scene within four minutes.


Whale Flop
JP Morgan CEO's Pay Halved
Blamed for bad trade that cost bank $6 billion.
Cabinet Exodus
Interior Secretary Steps Down
Ken Salazar will leave in March.
GANGSTER SQUAD
FBI Arrests 27 in NY Mob Raid
Reportedly from three of region’s five Mafia families.
DIRTY DIGGER
Murdoch Rants on Twitter on Welfare
About 400-pound NYC woman who fell through sidewalk.
LI-NO!
Sundance Snubs ‘The Canyons’
Producers believe Lohan is to blame.
Sign Up and Share

Invite Friends Sign Up
GET The Cheat Sheet
A speedy, smart summary of news and must-reads from across the Web. You'll love the featured original stories on politics, entertainment, and more from The Daily Beast's diverse group of contributors.


GET Culture Beast
Weekly cultural recommendations from The Daily Beast.


BeastTV
play

Obama: Our 'Rights Are At Stake'

In an effort to curb gun violence, President Obama called for universal background checks, a ban on assault weapons, and a ban on magazine clips larger than 10 rounds Wednesday, saying the proposed legislation would protect, not destroy, Americans' constitutional rights.



More from The Daily Beast

Robot Cars Are Coming
by Abby Haglage
Charlie Sheen on Partying & More
by Marlow Stern
Backstage in Milan
by Kevin Tachman


Around the Web

Facebook Twitter
Visit The Daily Beast


If you are on a mobile device or cannot view the images in this message, click here to view this email in your Web browser.

To ensure delivery of these emails, please add thedailybeast@e2.thedailybeast.com to your address book.

If you have changed your mind and no longer wish to receive these emails, or think you have received this message in error,
you can safely unsubscribe here.