RefBan

Referral Banners

Friday, October 12, 2012

Big Theological Questions that Science Fiction Should Answer

October 12th, 2012Top Story

Big Theological Questions that Science Fiction Should Answer

By Charlie Jane Anders

Big Theological Questions that Science Fiction Should AnswerWe love it when science fiction gets cosmic. And some of science fiction's greatest creators have proved, over the years, that science fiction doesn't have stay away from big religious topics — as long as you avoid some basic mistakes. In fact, science fiction can say things about the nature of the universe, and the Divine, that plain old theological texts just can't.

We asked five theologians what questions they would like to see science fiction tackle — and here's what they told us.

Images by Dinyctis/Deviant Art.

One thing's clear once you start looking around: theologians love science fiction. They're writing books about SF and theology, they're doing conferences on the topic, and they're seeing SF as a great vehicle for looking at the huge questions in their field. (I was sad that I was unable to get in touch with Stephen May, an Anglican priest and professor who recently gave a talk on Iain M. Banks.)

Science fiction is great for proposing answers to huge questions, without being stymied by "theological firewalls," or having to stick to the rigor of formal philosophy, says Lorenzo DiTommaso, a religion professor at Concordia University.

Science fiction has a special power to explore theological questions because of its ability to "build well-imagined worlds," says Robert Geraci, a religion professor at Manhattan College and author of Apocalyptic A.I.: Visions of Heaven in Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, and Virtual Reality When you inhabit the worlds of a great SF author, you can experience ideas in a personal way, that's different than just reading about abstract ideas.

But also, science fiction authors don't have to give you the answer, says Geraci — they just have to raise the questions. He adds:

For example, Charlie Stross on the Singularity. His book Accelerando is, in some sense both criticism of and cheerleading for transhumanist expectations for the future. A theological text on transhumanism is almost certainly going to have to come down on one end of the spectrum or the other... [but] Stross gets to have it both ways.

Some science fiction and fantasy authors make their theological explorations more obviously, like Mary Doria Russell in the "Jesuits in Space" novel The Sparrow, says Davidson College's Fuji Lozada. But there are also obvious theological concerns in the work of people like Ursula K. Le Guin.

Adds Lozada:

Religions always have a conception of what it means to be human, and some science fiction writers have pushed the boundaries of what it means to be human in religious terms as well. Clearly, Philip K. Dick, Asimov, China Mieville, and even Data from Star Trek do this with cyborgs/robots, but [authors] like Kathleen Ann Goonan and Greg Bear have done it in terms of biotechnology. As a China specialist, I especially like Neal Stephenson's Diamond Age in terms of what it means to be human. I read it on my Palm phone while in Shanghai, and it was eerie how much I can see future and current Shanghai in it.

It's hard to think of a theological topic that science fiction hasn't dealt with, says James McGrath, a Butler University theologian who writes for the Exploring Our Matrix blog. "Predestination and free will have come up regularly," says McGrath: "a couple of examples that come to mind include the Dune novels and Robert Sawyer's FlashForward."

And there have been some great explorations of religion in relation to time travel, like Michael Moorcock's "Behold the Man." Science fiction can say some interesting things about whether the past is "something that always exists," and whether history can be changed, opening up questions about human freedom, adds McGrath — who has a time travel and religion story that he's dying to write.

Big Theological Questions that Science Fiction Should Answer

Questions Science Fiction Should Address

So what theological topics would these theologians love to see science fiction deal with more extensively? Here are some:

The philosophy of creating worlds and the future

Geraci would like to see science fiction writers trying "something self-reflexive: analyzing their own medium as myth." Since science fiction writers literally create worlds, it would be interesting to look at this as a mythological construct: what worlds do SF writers create, and how do they create them? How much can a writer reshape the actual physical world, and how many ways can you do this? "This is directly tied (in my mind) to the question of what kind of work and the limits of such work that can be done with a religious text," says Geraci.

"I would like to see science/speculative fiction move away from escapist fantasies and post-apocalyptic nightmares, and move towards formulating a coherent philosophy for the future," says DiTommaso, whose next book is The Architecture of Apocalypticism, the first volume of a trilogy. He wants to see science fiction writers try to create a more coherent philosophy that balances "liberal values and respect for all life forms with the demands imposed by the effects of runaway population growth in a limited and increasingly unbalanced ecosystem."

What if God was provably real?

McGrath would love to see more science fiction stories set in a universe where God was out there, and you could seek His advice or help. Says McGrath: "Relatively few stories explore a scenario in which something like a monotheistic God - even if that is in fact a sentience that emerges from the universe as a whole rather than being external to it - exists and can be sought for its/his/her wisdom and intervention." He mostly liked how the rebooted Battlestar Galactica dealt with the notion of a monotheistic God that might answer prayers, but remained mysterious.

Adds McGrath:

If it turned out that what you think of as "God" really exists, but is an alien life form like Star Trek's Q or is a cosmic sentience that emerged from a previous universe, prior to the last Big Crunch and subsequent Big Bang, would they still worship such a deity? Reflecting on theology through the lens of sci-fi can be a good way to explore what you believe and why, and what is really important to you.

What if the Bible was literally true?

Says Geraci, "It would be amusing (from my perspective) to see a story on 'what if the Creationists are actually right?' As the Young Earth Creationists are locked in (to them) mortal combat with mainstream science, it would be a nice spin on what SF usually does while remaining within the functional confines of the genre."

Adds McGrath, "It could be interesting to have time-traveling fundamentalists eventually cause the 'literal truth' of all the stories in their Scriptures (whether the Bible or some other text in another tradition) and eventually go back and create the world — thus making themselves "God" in the process of trying to defend the God depicted in their sacred texts."

The Relationship Between Science and Religion

Lozada says a lot of great science fiction explores the sometimes rocky relations between religion and science, and this is something that actually helps you to explore religious ideas in general. He adds:

People can read Stephen J. Gould's Rock of Ages or Ages of Rocks, contrast the ideas of Richard Feynman and Sir John Polkinghorne (OK, I make my students read that stuff) to examine the sometimes contentious, sometimes harmonious relationship between science and religion as knowledge and meaning creating human practices, but a classic that I use is Sagan's Contact (I'm a big Jodie Foster fan, and college students like movies, but the book is much more expressive about exploring the relationship between science and religion, other than the obvious embodiment in the Jodie Foster/Matthew McConnaughey relationship). This also comes out in Stephenson's Quicksilver trilogy (if you consider that sci fi).

He also thinks science fiction has something useful to say about the ways in which religious organizations and societies are structured — and he'd love to see more anthropological science fiction, in the vein of Le Guin.

Why do we have faith?

And finally, the theologians we talked to said they'd like to see more science fiction about why people believe in God to begin with. McGrath asked on his blog a while back, "What would it take to make you lose your faith/change your beliefs?" If you were given a TARDIS and had access to all of time and space, would that strengthen or weaken your religious beliefs? That's another thought experiment that McGrath finds interesting.

And science fiction often deals with the future — which is essential to people's conceptions of God, says Christopher McMahon, Associate Professor of Theology at Saint Vincent College, Latrobe, PA. The whole notion of revelation and the end of the world is tied up with God, and science fiction can help to illuminate the nature of these constructs. Why do people need to have some conception of the future to respond to God in the present? What does "eternity" mean? These are religious questions that science fiction can help to make clearer, says McMahon.

A Final Thought

And finally, McGrath has a provocative notion:

I don't think that "science fiction" is a completely separate category from either "philosophy" or "religion." They overlap — one is a genre, the other two are domains of human exploration. Philosophers have long written science fiction stories as a way of engaging in thought experiments (Daniel Dennett's "Where Am I?" is my favorite example), and sci-fi has regularly explored philosophical terrain (The Matrix has as its premise an updating of Descartes' exploration of the question of whether our senses might be entirely deceived so that our perception of reality could be completely wrong). Religion told stories about traveling to worlds "up there" and visitors from them coming here, long before the science element became part of our storytelling conventions.

And so what science fiction does is bring to the fore the changed context we inhabit compared to past generations - we have sent people upwards and know, unlike the author of Genesis, that there is no dome right up there with lights fixed into it. And through advanced telescopes we know that the universe is far bigger than most (but not all!) ancient people tended to imagine. Science fiction provides a great way of asking what theological and philosophical ideas from the past still make sense in our modern context, of winnowing out those that do not, and of exploring ways to adapt and update those that kind of might but at least require a bit of tweaking. And by exploring these things in a genre that is (for most of its writers and fans, anyway) explicitly fiction, it can do so in a manner that is more tentative and exploratory, and thus potentially less controversial, than if someone wove a narrative about other worlds and about sci-fi gods and presented it as fact rather than myth or fiction.

Number of comments

This Week’s Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12th

October 12th, 2012Top Story

This Week's Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12th

This Week’s Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12thThis week we made ourselves smarter, bought two computers for the price of one, motivated ourselves into exercising, and more. Here's a look back.

This Week's Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12th

Top 10 Ways to Make Yourself Look (and Be) Smarter

Whether you're trying to survive an intensive college schedule or just want to seem smarter in front of your friends, you can do a lot of things to both look and be smarter. More »


This Week's Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12th

Five Best Headphones

When it comes to headphones, we know "best" is definitely a subjective term. There are tons of considerations: price, comfort, audio quality, noise cancellation, frequency response, bang for the buck, the list goes on. More »


This Week's Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12th

Set Your Desktop to Beautiful Video Game Art

We can't play our favorite games all the time. We have to work, after all. Nonetheless, you can still keep those gaming memories close with some amazing video game art as your wallpaper. More »


This Week's Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12th

When Buying Two Computers Is Cheaper Than Buying One

You can buy some pretty powerful laptops these days, and a lot of people are quick to take advantage of beasts like the MacBook Pro or big gaming laptops like the ASUS G55VW. More »


This Week's Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12th

Want to Read Faster? Stop Saying The Words in Your Head As You Read

When you read, do you hear the words in your mind or even subconsciously say them under your breath? Break this one habit, called subvocalization, and you can double or even triple your reading speed. More »


This Week's Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12th

From the Tips Box: Dirty Glasses, Firefox Options, and Tablet Stands

Readers offer their best tips for cleaning your glasses without streaks, getting a better Firefox options panel, and keeping your tablet propped up..
Don't like the gallery layout? More »


This Week's Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12th

How To Motivate Yourself Into an Exercise Routine You'll Actually Stick To

If getting active and staying healthy were easy, everyone would do it...but we don't. We come home after a long day of sitting in a chair to de-stress by sitting in another chair, unable to summon the energy to take a walk or hit the gym. More »


This Week's Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12th

I'm Jeff Atwood, Cofounder of Stack Exchange, and This Is How I Work

Jeff Atwood cofounded and built Stack Overflow in 2008. The site, which features questions and answers on all things programming, grew into the Stack Exchange network-a free, open collection of 89 sites on topics from cooking and photography to IT security and cognitive science. More »


This Week's Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12th

Seven Creative Uses for Google Street View

Google designed Street View so you'd always be able to tell what your destination looks like before you get there. That's not all it's useful for though! More »


This Week's Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12th

How to Win Over Someone Who Doesn't Like You

Does your co-worker scowl every time you walk by? Is that guy in your networking group consistently aloof? Sometimes, for no clear reason, someone may decide they dislike you-and if you want a more comfortable work environment, it's up to you to change the dynamic. More »


This Week's Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12th

CV Maker Creates Beautiful, Professional-Looking Resumes Online in Minutes

Regardless of the job you apply for, you'll need a sharp-looking resume that looks good on-screen and in-print to make a good impression. CV Maker is a webapp that makes it easy to create multiple professional, good-looking resumes online, save them for future updates and editing, and print them... More »


This Week's Most Popular Posts: October 6th to 12th

Don't Do What You Love. Do What You Are.

You've no doubt heard this career advice before: "Do what you love." Brazen Careerist founder Penelope Trunk calls this simple and idealistic advice absurd. More »


Number of comments

This Is The Man Who Made The First Supersonic Parachute Jump, Just Not On Purpose

October 12th, 2012Top Story

This Is The Man Who Made The First Supersonic Parachute Jump, Just Not On Purpose

By Jason Torchinsky

This Is The Man Who Made The First Supersonic Parachute Jump, Just Not On PurposeWe're all pretty excited about the Red Bull-sponsored supersonic, stratospheric jump that Felix Baumgartner will be making this weekend. And while Baumgartner will likely be setting all sorts of man-outside-of-an-airplane speed records, it's worth looking back at the man who did it first, back in 1966. Even if doing it was probably the last thing he wanted to do.

Bill Weaver was the man, and Bill Weaver was a test pilot for Lockheed. On January 25, 1966, Weaver and a systems specialist named Jim Zwayer were testing a slightly modified SR-71 Blackbird, a spyplane capable of flying three times the speed of sound. This particular Blackbird had its center-of-gravity moved aft so new procedures to reduce drag and improve performance could be tested. This alteration also made the plane less stable longitudinally.

While in flight at Mach 3.2, the inlet to the right engine developed a malfunction. At supersonic speeds, air inlets to the engines are complex things, with variable intake portal sizes and all manner of complex pathways to slow the intake air speed to subsonic before contacting the engine. If things go wrong, the engine can "unstart" which I suppose is like shutting down, only far, far more violent, as supersonic shock waves are caused by the condition. From what I can tell, it seems like having a localized hurricane in an engine.

To nobody's delight, this is what happened to the right engine just as Weaver was entering a right-hand bank. The loss of engine thrust on the right caused violent yawing of the plane, and nothing Weaver could do with the controls could stop it. Before he could even radio to his specialist right behind him to try and avoid ejecting until they'd slowed down and lost altitude, the plane started disintegrating around them.

It seems like a Wile E. Coyote-type of situation— flying faster than sound as your aircraft breaks away around you, leaving figure floating in the air, oblivious of the danger. Except it wasn't anything like that. It all happened within two to three seconds, and was incredibly violent.

Weaver never even ejected from the plane— the plane just went away. Luckily, his pressure suit inflated and his small guide parachute deployed, his inflated pressure suit acting as a sort of "escape pod," as he called it.

Then, in Weaver's own words:

My next recollection was a hazy thought that I was having a bad dream. Maybe I'll wake up and get out of this mess, I mused. Gradually regaining consciousness, I realized this was no dream; it had really happened. That also was disturbing, because I could not have survived what had just happened. Therefore, I must be dead. Since I didn't feel bad–just a detached sense of euphoria–I decided being dead wasn't so bad after all. AS FULL AWARENESS took hold, I realized I was not dead, but had somehow separated from the airplane. I had no idea how this could have happened; I hadn't initiated an ejection. The sound of rushing air and what sounded like straps flapping in the wind confirmed I was falling, but I couldn't see anything. My pressure suit's face plate had frozen over and I was staring at a layer of ice.

The pressure suit was inflated, so I knew an emergency oxygen cylinder in the seat kit attached to my parachute harness was functioning. It not only supplied breathing oxygen, but also pressurized the suit, preventing my blood from boiling at extremely high altitudes. I didn't appreciate it at the time, but the suit's pressurization had also provided physical protection from intense buffeting and g-forces. That inflated suit had become my own escape capsule.

This Is The Man Who Made The First Supersonic Parachute Jump, Just Not On Purpose

My next concern was about stability and tumbling. Air density at high altitude is insufficient to resist a body's tumbling motions, and centrifugal forces high enough to cause physical injury could develop quickly. For that reason, the SR-71′s parachute system was designed to automatically deploy a small-diameter stabilizing chute shortly after ejection and seat separation. Since I had not intentionally activated the ejection system–and assuming all automatic functions depended on a proper ejection sequence–it occurred to me the stabilizing chute may not have deployed.

However, I quickly determined I was falling vertically and not tumbling. The little chute must have deployed and was doing its job. Next concern: the main parachute, which was designed to open automatically at 15,000 ft. Again I had no assurance the automatic-opening function would work. I couldn't ascertain my altitude because I still couldn't see through the iced-up face plate. There was no way to know how long I had been blacked-out or how far I had fallen. I felt for the manual-activation D-ring on my chute harness, but with the suit inflated and my hands numbed by cold, I couldn't locate it. I decided I'd better open the face plate, try to estimate my height above the ground, then locate that "D" ring. Just as I reached for the face plate, I felt the reassuring sudden deceleration of main-chute deployment. I raised the frozen face plate and discovered its uplatch was broken. Using one hand to hold that plate up, I saw I was descending through a clear, winter sky with unlimited visibility. I was greatly relieved to see Jim's parachute coming down about a quarter of a mile away. I didn't think either of us could have survived the aircraft's breakup, so seeing Jim had also escaped lifted my spirits incredibly.

This Is The Man Who Made The First Supersonic Parachute Jump, Just Not On Purpose

Unfortunately, Jim Zwayer was dead, his neck broken almost immediately as the Blackbird broke up around him. Weaver was, incredibly, uninjured. A local rancher in a cowboy hat and a helicopter landed by Weaver, and took him to a nearby hospital.

Weaver was back testing Blackbirds two weeks later, and continued a long and successful career as a test pilot. In fact, after he retired, he continued to fly Orbital Science's L-1011-based Stargazer aerial rocket launching aircraft.

So, as you watch Bumgartner perform his incredible, record-breaking jump on Sunday, give a thought to the man that did it first, unintentionally. (Hat tip to Eslader!)

(Source: Bill Weaver's own full account)

Number of comments