RefBan

Referral Banners

Monday, July 9, 2012

The Nazi breeding program that resurrected an extinct species

July 9th, 2012Top Story

The Nazi breeding program that resurrected an extinct species

By George Dvorsky

The Nazi breeding program that resurrected an extinct species An indelible characteristic of fascist ideology is the celebration of a mythic past, an over-the-top nostalgic fixation often accompanied by attempts to restore things to the way they used to be "back in the good ol' days". For the Nazis, this meant a return to Old Germania — the old Germany of the Nibelungenlied — a time of (supposed) unparalleled prosperity, happiness, and pride.

The Nazis, of course, took this imperative to extremes, including a little known attempt to restore its forests back to their original medieval splendor. But in order to do so, they would have to bring back an animal that went extinct in 1672 — a problem that two German zoologists tackled with a curious breeding program.

The Nazi breeding program that resurrected an extinct species Writing in Cabinet Magazine, Michael Wang describes the lengths the Nazis went to to bring back the ancient auroch, a large oxen-like creature. Once found "everywhere in Germany," the absence of the species riled the Nazis who in turn recruited two scientists to help, Heinz and Lutz Heck. Undaunted by the challenge, the brothers set upon the task of "recreating" the auroch by interbreeding similar creatures from around the world. Wang describes the Nazi rationale behind the project:

This conflation of biological and aesthetic destiny coincided with a strain of Nazi thought that sought to apply pseudo-Darwinian theories in support of a racialized conception of the state. In this mode, the zoologist Konrad Lorenz identified parallels between the changes he observed in animals as the result of their domestication and what he saw as the deleterious genetic effects of civilization.

By referring to centuries-old accounts and preserved illustrations of the aurochs, the Heck brothers crossed several modern breeds of cattle, including Corsican breeds, Hungarian grey cattle, Scottish Highland cattle, and others. The end result was a creature that bore a startling resemblance to the auroch.

But not content to have the neo-aurochs locked inside of zoos, the Nazis set about the recreation of its "natural" environment. Wang writes:

The Nazi breeding program that resurrected an extinct species

In Lorenz's conception, however, biological unity extended beyond the physical and behavioral attributes of the animal itself. Following on the work of the Estonian biologist Jakob von Uexküll, Lorenz understood an organism as essentially linked to its environment. Together, organism and environment formed a "unified functional cycle," a phenomenon that Lorenz observed exclusively in relation to wild animals. Just as Lorenz saw the effects of domestication as deleterious fragmentation (the modification of discrete traits), the original act of domestication was itself a kind of fragmentation. Domestication severed an organism from its natural place within an environmental whole.

According to this system, then, the recreation of the aurochs would be incomplete were this animal to be confined to the artificial sphere of a zoological garden. To restore the biological unity of the aurochs would require the restoration of its original environs. In the imagination of the Hecks and their research patron-Reichsjägermeister Hermann Göring-this environment was not in fact entirely lost to time. The ideal site for the introduction of the Heck aurochs would be the primeval forest of Bialowiez˙a, one of the last old-growth forests remaining in Europe. At the border of Poland and Belarus, the forest had been historically protected as the privileged hunting grounds of Polish kings and Russian tsars.

In addition to the reconstructed aurochs, the Nazis also worked to restore all natural game to the forest, including bison, boar, elk, and deer. The bison were a particular challenge, leading them to interbreed European bison with Canadian wood bison to return the dwindling stock to larger numbers.

All these efforts, however, were largely thwarted on account of the war — but not before the new aurochs were set loose on the forest. Wang explains what happened next:

As the Hecks had envisioned, their regenerated aurochs persisted in a semi-wild state in the Bialowiez˙a forest. When Lutz Heck heard that some of the animals had survived the war, he proudly cited this fact as evidence of their suitability to the natural environs. To the Polish forestry service, however, the stray cattle were profoundly unnatural: they had no place in the forest as it had been known for hundreds of years. At Karpin'ski's request, a provisional corral was built with the intention of capturing the Heck animals, which, forestry officials correctly assumed, would not survive on their own. The post–World War II revision of Poland's borders hindered this task. Bialowiez˙a forest had been carved in two, with the eastern side under Soviet jurisdiction. By crossing the border into Belarus for increasingly long periods, the Heck aurochs evaded the Polish foresters, and most likely soon perished. "It seems that nothing can be done at this point," Karpin'ski lamented, "to save the remaining animals from extinction."

But the Heck aurochs did not disappear altogether. Now known as Heck cattle, these animals can be found in various farms in Germany and Europe. There have even been attempts in the Netherlands and elsewhere to introduce the breed into state nature reserves to replace the missing megafauna there. Wang concludes his piece rather nicely,

The realization of the Hecks' wild ideal proved unsustainable. Their vision of biological reunification continually sought to expand its borders: from the regeneration of a single animal to the violent reshaping of an entire landscape. No curve of a horn, or shade of an eel-striped coat could satisfy this totalizing vision. Ultimately, the Hecks' biological methods were inadequate to their task-for the aurochs was not a species, but a symbol.

Be sure to read Michael Wang's entire article as there's lots more to this fascinating story.

Via Disinfo.

Top image via The Sixth Extinction. Inset images via Cabinet and Sixth Extinction.

Number of comments

The Death Of BMW's M Brand

July 9th, 2012Top Story

The Death Of BMW's M Brand

By Bill Caswell

The Death Of BMW's M BrandBMW's announcement today of the Lime Rock Edition M3 was the final nail in the coffin for me. The company that claims more 24-Hour wins at the Nürburgring than any other manufacturer just launched a track edition M3 that has no serious performance improvement over the current M3. 

It's basically bolt-on Pep Boys parts like a flat bottom Knight Rider steering wheel and special paint. And I'm guessing there is a Lime Rock track map sticker somewhere or a plaque on the dash that tells you this is something special. But that's just it. This isn't something special. It's simply a marketing exercise. A fraud. Not unlike pumping a fake engine noise through the car stereo like BMW does with the M5.
 
It's for guys who want to be associated with racetracks but don't actually go to the track themselves. It's for the modern poser racer. A luxury version of those fast and furious Honda civics with race seats and belts but stock engines that kids drive around on the street.   
 
I can't wait to meet the guy that buys these Lime Rock editions. He's the one that checks out of his hotel in the morning wearing his fire suit for his BMW CCA driver school session that doesn't start till 10 am because he wants the girl at the front desk to know that he is "racing" today. That guy. 

The one that wears firesuits because he wants to be a racer even though he's in his street car that he takes to the train every day. That's who will buy this car.   
 
So why is it so painful? The M brand used to mean something.  Really mean something. To me and auto enthusiasts everywhere.  I can't think of a performance division of a company with more creditability than BMW's motorsport brand back in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. 

The Death Of BMW's M BrandTo fully appreciate this you need a little history in BMW M brand.  It was created to build homologation specials.  Cars built for specific racing series in minimum quantity to meet the rules.  It started with the M1 in 1978. Then came hand-build 5 series cars that at one point were the fastest sedans in the world – as delivered from the factory. 

Next came the original M3, known to us car guys as the E30 M3.  Built by BMW for one purpose. To win races.  And it won so much its known as the most winning chassis in touring car history. This was BMW's M brand.   
 
So what is it now?  Besides the M3, we have am M1 (or 1 Series M Coupe so it's not to be confused with the real M1). 

To be fair, this car is amazing. I love it. But BMW built 800 or so and called it a day. Did one go racing?  Not that I know of. And then there are the M brand SUVs: an X6M and a X5M. Did either of these go racing?  Sort of.  BMW gave one to a journalist to compete in One Lap of America this year and it got beat by a Jeep Cherokee. A Jeep Cherokee took down the M Brand.  (Ed. Note: Matt Farrah should be along soon to explain how the Jeep was modified and the X5 M was not.)
 
Now to be fair BMW ran the new M5 — yes the one with the fake engine noises — in One Lap and it won its "Luxury Sedan" class. So my point is that BMW no longer makes high performance automobiles known as the Ultimate Driving Machine. They now make luxury automobiles that are the ultimate motorsport poser mobile. 

The Death Of BMW's M BrandThere is no car that says "I want to pretend I'm a performance driver, a racer, but never go to the track" more than the current M brand.  It's a fraud leveraging the company's rich racing history and it pisses me off.   
 
Let's took a look at that racing history that the brand was created for.  When was the last time BMW won an F1 race? Le Mans? Any of the large sports car races other than Sebring? I'm ignoring Grand Am where BMW races against KIAs and Dinan builds engines for a prototype team. That doesn't count as a factory program. About the only race on the planet that Nürburgring which happened last in the ALMS M3 car in 2010.   
 
Ever seen that ALMS car?  Its nothing like the production car we buy.  It has double wishbone front suspension.  EVERY M3 ever sold has McPherson front struts. And we haven't even gotten to the weirdo rear transaxle deal with its built-in air conditioning pump.  Huh, was that a factory option? 

My point is that BMW used to build amazing street cars to meet the rules of racing and win.  Now they choose races with loose rules and bring cars nothing like the one we buy and turn around and sell us models that have nothing to do with racing other than the sticker on the dash.   
 
So back to today's Lime Rock Edition M3 that BMW just announced. How does this thing even get approved?  I can picture the conversation in the marketing department now:  
 
BMW Marketing Guy 1: Guys we really need to leverage our M brand. 
 
Let's release an M3 with a race track associated with it. Yeah like that big one in Germany Nutterburgerringring or something. But I hear that place is expensive to rent, maybe we should use that track near headquarters here in the US, Lime Rock?
 
BMW Marketing Guy 2: Yeah!

BMW Marketing Guy 1: Don't we already sponsor that track?  Sweet, lets make a lime rock edition. 
 
BMW Marketing Guy 2: Whats that mean?  
 
BMW Marketing Guy 1: I dont know but people will think its special.  
 
BMW Marketing Guy 2: Really? Why?  
 
BMW Marketing Guy 1: Well, because we'll paint it a special color and add all our interior add ons like the Knight Rider wheel with the flat bottom!  
 
BMW Marketing Guy 2: But shouldn't it have a signfiicant increase in performance to have a racetrack badge on it?  
 
BMW Marketing Guy 1: No, No, No, the car doesn't need to be faster or handle better because we named it after a racetrack! Just the opposite. Leave the engine the same and give it one of our handling packages that we already have. Like the competition package, that sounds like it should be on a track car.

 
BMW's Motorsport Brand has lost its soul, and will slowly fade into marketing mediocrity. A friend pointed out another company with a rich history in racing that abandoned it roots and went after the luxury auto market: Saab. 

Obviously, BMW wont go bankrupt anytime soon, but what happens when all the luxury buyers that fell in love with performance brand in the 1980's stop driving cars? I don't have that answer but three years ago I asked a marketing executive at BMW this exact question after he told me BMW was supporting Golf and Yachting. 

His response was along the line of 'I don't know, I won't be working here when that happens.' 

Time will tell. 

Number of comments

The Browser daily newsletter [9 July 2012]

9 July 2012
Thank you to all those of you who've joined our new membership scheme. For those who haven't, please consider supporting us by becoming a member. Click here to find out about the extra benefits available to members.

 Best of the Moment

The End Of China’s Economic Miracle

Minxin Pei | Newsweek | 8 July 2012

"Twenty years ago, Japan experienced the humiliation of going from world economic champ to chump within a few years of its financial meltdown. Today it seems to be China’s turn." Sharp analysis on limits of state capitalism Comments

Youth Of The Ice Age

David Pilling | FT | 6 July 2012

For Japan's graduates, the era of salarymen and stay-at-home wives is almost, if not quite, over. Economic, social change has seen to that. Pilling casts today's youth as a generation in search of meaning. Here's what they are doing Comments

The Importance Of Being Orwell

Christopher Hitchens | Vanity Fair | 9 July 2012

Hitchens introduces Orwell's collected diaries: "By his determination to seek elusive but verifiable truth, he showed how much can be accomplished by an individual who unites the qualities of intellectual honesty and moral courage" Comments

Is The Web Driving Us Mad?

Tony Dokoupil | Newsweek | 8 July 2012

"No one is arguing for some kind of Amish future. But the research is now making it clear that the Internet is not 'just' another delivery system. It is creating a whole new mental environment." Measured piece, despite the headline Comments

Pistorius: A Hero, Yes, But Not An Olympian

Mick Hume | Sp!ked | 5 July 2012

Should we let Oscar Pistorius compete at the Olympics? Here's the argument against. "We are faced with the extraordinary situation where a disabled athlete can actually have an inbuilt advantage which other runners cannot match" Comments

Are Prodigies Autistic?

Scott Barry Kaufman | Psychology Today | 6 July 2012

Begging headline. This is more about intelligence and memory. Tests on nine current child prodigies find IQ range of 108-147—smart, but not dazzling. Memory is the standout: "Off the scale". And yes, some hints of autism Comments